Tuesday, July 15, 2008

When faith is frayed - Financial Review time

Everyone, this news is one of the latest truthful mainstream articles out today. Those of you over 55 (check rules on accounts), you have far greater control over your retirement funds now. Many analysts who are being truthful, are telling people to get into gold and precious metals. I mean pull a majority if not all of it out, and buy gold and silver coins. Get yourself a big enough gun safe and stash your money, and get a shotgun.

Those under 55, you will want to re-invest your retirement funds into diversity accounts including oversees currency and commodities. Stocks and bonds are going to die, but gold will be around forever. A lot of fund managers can now dip into gold reserves to invest clients money. Either that, or transfer money into Euros and/or Francs. Some analysts are saying just take the 10% hit and pull the money out now, and after gold takes off during the depression you will have doubled your money, or more. There is a 20% backside tax, but several analysts are talking about gold going upwards of $2000 to $4000, and you could be holding a pretty good nest egg.

I am going to list some websites. I hope you will not just listen to me, but listen to the experts I have been listening to. I wish I would have played my hand better back on 2002-2005, or maybe I would have some money to protect now. Unforunately, I don't. I will feel really awful if I don't warn you much more fervently on the coming economic collapse. I am reading many books, and listening to many financial experts on what to do in the coming year. Please, please, please take action. I did not listen to anyone back in 2005 when the housing crisis was hitting, and I paid for it. I am no longer sticking my head in the sand, but listening to experts on the web and local brokers. I will personally not be making the same mistakes twice.

Its great if you have a garden, because that is where its going to get interesting over the next year. I will most likely be starting my own garden here shortly. We have to grow our own food to stay healthy. I recommend taking a look at www.efoodsdirect.com as they sell many products which are just very prudent to have around, especially during economic downturns, depressions, and collapses. Storable foods, emergency supplies, 3-day packs, water purification, solar panels are all good things to invest in for many different reasons.

This should be forwarded to the remainder of the family. Let everyone get online and do their own research. I am providing initial links, but nobody should be sitting idly by right now and "hope" our government will bail them out. Its our money they are playing with and the bankers have done a really bad job at taking care of our business. They have just been looking out after their own butts, and even some of them got burned.

I don't want this to be gloom and doom. If a house is on fire, its a bad thing, but the best thing to do is warn people about it. We can all live another day once its been put out. The problems right now are because of the bankers (the big ones in New York), the Federal Reserve and the dollar devaluation. Housing, food prices, gas and commodities are all affected because of this.

for more information contact me at rhawk301-at-gmail.com

http://www.ft.com/home/uk

http://www.kitco.com/ (but look at the 5 year charts, and when gold is supposed to jump and slump)
http://www.goldseek.com/

http://www.theinternationalforecaster.com/ (very good site, Bob Chapman has been in this business for 35+ years)

http://zfacts.com/p/461.html (National debt information)

Listen to Jim Rogers on Bloomberg

Bloomberg has been pretty straight on news as well http://www.bloomberg.com/index.html?Intro=intro3

Here is a PCWorld article of all things about dollar devaluation

Here is the CIO forrester article it mentions

Forbes article talking about smart investing during inflationary times, and the devaluation of the dollar.

The buck doesn't stop here; it just keeps falling

Speculation, weak dollar add $45 to oil prices: OPEC

Geopolitics and Geoeconmics by F. William Engdahl

U.S. dollar devaluation not the only currency bet in town

Here is an Indian newspaper talking about the dollar collapse

Jerome Corsi's RedAlert newsletter
Subscription only, but good to look at the blurbs and headlines to do further research

Prediction of market downturn hitting target

Google News Search on Dollar devaluation

Infowars news archive of financial articles



KEY POINTS (not from me, from smart investors)

1) Favor those countries with strong external balance sheets and high savings rates (JPY, SGD, KRW, CHF, TWD). Note that these are the anti-carry trade currencies from this cycle.

2) Favor those countries that have/make stuff that the world wants (kind of an offshoot of point 1, but more geared to commodity producers that will continue to experience favorable terms-of-trade shocks). This means CAD, NOK, AUD, and maybe NZD. I am less hot on AUD and NZD because of their massive current account deficits.

3) Stay away from the big borrowers (USD, GBP).

4) Buy gold - it's the only real currency.

Tom Petruno
Market Beat

When faith is frayed

Blows to the banking system are raising unsettling questions in an already turbulent economy.
Tom Petruno, Market Beat
July 12, 2008
In a modern financial system, nothing is more frightening than a run on the bank.

The U.S. now has suffered through a series of them, and they are escalating in size and scope -- posing a serious threat to the already reeling economy.

On Friday, rumors swamped financial markets that the federal government would be forced to step in to aid mortgage-finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which together own or guarantee $5 trillion in U.S. home loans.

In Wall Street's version of a bank run, investors drove shares of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to 17-year lows, signaling a gnawing lack of faith in the companies' ability to survive rising mortgage defaults without government help.

Later in the day, regulators took over IndyMac Bank of Pasadena, saying the $32-billion lender had collapsed under the weight of bad home loans and withdrawals by spooked depositors. It was the second-largest bank failure in U.S. history.

Friday's events were felt around the world, knocking the battered U.S. dollar lower and driving up interest rates.

"This is a flare-up in the financial forest fire that is far beyond anything we've seen before," said Christopher Low, chief economist at investment firm FTN Financial in New York.

And it is triggering worries that would have been unthinkable even a year ago -- including that the U.S. Treasury's debt might lose its AAA credit grade because of heavy blows to the nation's fiscal health from the housing mess.

Just four months ago, many on Wall Street believed they had seen the worst of the credit crisis rooted in the housing market's woes. The collapse in March of brokerage Bear Stearns Cos., a key player in the business of packaging dicey mortgages for sale to investors, was the kind of high-profile calamity that historically has marked the end of financial crises.

Bear Stearns, too, was a victim of a devastating run on the bank, as many of its creditors suddenly stopped lending to the firm and investors dumped the company's stock.

Reacting quickly, the Federal Reserve took unprecedented steps after Bear Stearns' demise to make cheap loans available to loss-ridden banks and, for the first time, to securities firms. The Fed's moves helped restore calm to markets by April.

But by May, investors' focus had returned to the slumping housing market and the likelihood that banks and brokerages would face more losses on mortgage-related debt. Confidence in the stock market, and in financial institutions large and small, eroded anew.

Worse, the price of oil began a stunning climb in April that still hasn't relented. Crude prices closed at $145.08 a barrel Friday, up from $100 as April began.

Record energy costs, coupled with surging food prices, raise the risk that more beleaguered consumers could fall behind on their mortgage payments.

"These prices for oil and food, in an economy 70% driven by consumers, are just adding more strains to the financial system," said Tom Atteberry, a fund manager at First Pacific Advisors in Los Angeles.

As worries about the economy mounted in June, stocks went into another tailspin that has continued in July. Wall Street now is officially in a bear market -- meaning a drop of at least 20% in key stock indexes -- for the first time since the plunge of 2000-02.

The Dow Jones index, which fell 128.48 points to 11,100.54 on Friday, now is down 21.6% from its record high last year.

That's still a long way from the 38% dive the Dow took from its peak in early 2000 to its low in October 2002.

But there are some parallels between the 2000-02 period and the current one that hint at worse to come.

The stock market's crash in 2000 began with the bust in highflying dot-com stocks. This time, the decline began with the bust in home prices and its disastrous effects on every industry tied to housing.

In 2002, weary investors were hit by a wave of corporate accounting scandals that began with fabled Enron Corp. By the summer of that year, an extraordinary crisis of confidence had developed: Investors simply felt that they couldn't trust what many companies were telling them about their sales or earnings. Share prices dived further.

This time, the crisis of confidence is in the U.S. banking system. Because so many banks and brokerages lent heavily to fund the housing boom, the losses from the housing bust permeate the financial system to a degree few analysts had predicted.

As home prices keep falling, "anything tied to U.S. residential real estate is seen at risk," said Allen Sinai at Decision Economics in New York.

Fearing more severe losses than they've already suffered, investors in recent weeks have fled stocks of some of the nation's biggest financial institutions at a pace that has stunned Wall Street.

This week, investors turned on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac with a vengeance.

Despite the companies' assurances that they have adequate capital cushions against surging defaults on the mortgages they own or guarantee, the market doesn't believe them.

For the federal government, that poses a quandary. Because of their size and importance to the mortgage market, it's inconceivable that Fannie and Freddie would be allowed to fail. But an outright takeover of the companies by the government, as some experts have suggested, could frighten foreign investors -- who are big lenders to the Treasury -- by, in effect, adding the companies' $5-trillion debt load to the Treasury's massive debt of $9.5 trillion.

Nationalizing the companies "would put the full faith and credit of the Treasury at risk," Sinai said. "It would make foreign investors think hard about buying U.S. Treasury debt."

The way you stop a bank run is to restore confidence. For Uncle Sam, the challenge isn't just to restore confidence among Americans, but also to make sure it doesn't evaporate among our foreign creditors.

tom.petruno@latimes.com

Friday, April 25, 2008

ALERT! ALERT! National Level Exercise Begins In May [FEMA/NORTHCOM]

In a very interesting press release, it seems FEMA is going to conduct a National Level "Exercise" NEP 2-08. From past experiences we know that the Federal government has staged false flag terror events in the wake of military drills. 9/11/2001 was an example as multiple drills from the DOD, CIA, and NORAD were all taking place at the same time as all hell broke loose with the "terror plot" unfolding.

Alex Jones raised a red level emergency just last week, and this event certainly has all the pinnings of "heh, watch and listen" style news. Take a look at the information contained here and if you happen to be anywhere in the country where these "drills" are taking place, by all means please get out a camcorder and post the stuff to YouTube.

http://www.fema.gov/news/newsrelease.fema?id=43299


National Level Exercise Begins In May

Release Date: April 24, 2008
Release Number: HQ-08-063

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Department of Homeland Security's Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Exercise Program (NEP) will conduct National Level Exercise 2-08 (NLE 2-08) a combined functional and full scale exercise from May 1 through May 8. NLE 2-08 will merge the objectives of U.S. Northern Command's (NORTHCOM) Ardent Sentry 2008 exercise, FEMA National Continuity Program's (NCP) Eagle Horizon 2008 exercise (formerly known as Forward Challenge), and FEMA Disaster Operation's Hurricane Preparedness Exercise (HPE).

The purpose of NLE 2-08 is to exercise national capabilities to prepare and respond to multiple incidents including both natural disasters and terrorist incidents. The exercise was designed to include scenario elements addressing hurricane preparedness and response, national continuity capabilities, and Defense Support to Civil Authorities coordination in response to weapons of mass destruction terrorist attacks. The exercise venues involve a Category 4 hurricane impacting the Mid Atlantic Coast and the National Capitol Region and multiple terrorist attacks in Washington State.

Also during NLE 2-08, the Chemical Stockpile Emergency Preparedness Program (CSEPP) will test it's response to an accidental chemical agent release at the Umatilla Chemical Depot in Oregon. Canada will also participate through their Staunch Maple exercise.

The exercise allows Federal officials to implement continuity plans, test communications connectivity, operations and procedures for performing essential government functions from alternate locations, and interagency coordination. Additionally, it serves to demonstrate that essential functions can be effectively conducted during threats and emergencies.

NLE 2-08 is a NEP exercise conducted within the five year exercise schedule. The NEP is the nation's overarching homeland security exercise program, provides the federal government with a national, interagency wide program and a multi-year planning system to focus, coordinate, plan, conduct, execute, evaluate and prioritize national security and homeland security preparedness-related exercise activities.

FEMA coordinates the federal government's role in preparing for, preventing,
mitigating the effects of, responding to, and recovering from all domestic disasters, whether natural or man-made, including acts of terror.
Last years National Level Exercise was called Vigilant Shield.
The FEMA 2008 Newsletter is here.
Emergency Response by Wire has some interesting information.
HSEEP Website

The NEP Presentation and schedule can be found here and nep2. It outlines several directives and time schedules. It also mentions a program called "Able Warrior" "Eagle Horizon" and "Ardent Sentry" which needs to be investigated as well.

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Why I am sticking to my Republican values

In the coming election John McCain was chosen by delegate count to be the presumptive nominee for the Republican party. Why do I say “by delegate count”? Since the beginning of this race the Republican party was split across multiple candidates. Of the major candidates with estimated delegates; John McCain (1325) Mike Huckabee (267), Ron Paul (21), Mitt Romney (255), Rudy Giuliani, Fred Thompson, Duncan Hunter, and Sam Brownback. Many candidates dropped out before super Tuesday, including Rudy Giuliani, but they were still on the ballot. Giuliani asked his supporters to vote for McCain, Mitt Romney dropped out giving up his delegates (presumably to McCain), and then Mike Huckabee dropped out, effectively giving the remainder up to McCain. However, Ron Paul has not given up his campaign since he still has nationwide support and wants to get his message out.

The Republican values which keep me voting are for limited government, a humble foreign policy, conservative and balanced fiscal spending, more liberty, less taxes, less laws, less government oversight on my personal life and property, aggressive immigration policies, strict control over foreign entanglements like NAFTA/WTO/CAFTA and very strict constitutional values. How about you, does that sound like the Republican Party you belong to, or perhaps think it should be?

In the coming months as we head towards our national convention I encourage everyone to examine the principles of what the Republican Party should be .vs. what people think we stand for now. If I asked you today what our national, state and county Republican parties stood for I imagine there would be a lot of blank stares. The reason for this is because our Republican party has been torn a part by several candidates who all mostly had different leadership styles, and views of the Republican Party. There wasn’t any binding value except for the foreign wars we are still fighting. Ron Paul is the only Republican candidate who has been dead-set against these wars and out of control foreign spending to fund these wars.

As Republicans we need to hold our elected candidates up to our values, and we need to be the ones setting the agenda for our party, not the mainstream media. If you look back upon the 2008 race I see a bunch of candidates who had various aspects of our Republican values, but no candidates who had them all, except for one. The mainstream media kept Ron Paul out of most all news even though he is the most conservative member of Congress and fits all the requirements of the Republican Party values. This media black out was the primary reason hardly anyone in the country heard about Ron Paul enough to make an informed decision. The Republican Party membership itself was also very concerned about their individual candidates, and they lost sight of what the national party is about, and how we have won elections in the past.

Republicans have won elections by stating our most steadfast ideals, including a humble foreign policy, conservative spending, lower taxes, and limited government. This strategy has always worked (when applied) because that is most of what the people want. When Republicans stray from those values we lose elections, it is that simple.

Where do we go from here? We need to get the party back to these conservative values, and make sure our candidates know that these values are what we expect of them. We don’t have leaders in this country, we have representatives and statesmen. Our President is also an elected representative of the people, of our party, of who needs to be a staunch supporter of our party and values. That President needs to make speeches to these values, tell the public how he is going to achieve those goals, and what benefits the people will have once those goals are met. Otherwise it opens a hole for “change” or some other stupid idea from the Democratic leadership.

This is our party, we the people decide who gets to represent us in Washington, and we dictate what that person is going to do for us. I suggest we start asking McCain these questions, demand our Republican values are followed or he should step aside and let Ron Paul lead our nation with true Republican and lasting values. We do know what we stand for; we just need to be confident.

You and I have a rendezvous with destiny. We will preserve for our children this, the last best hope of man on earth, or we will sentence them to take the first step into a thousand years of darkness. If we fail, at least let our children and our children's children say of us we justified our brief moment here. We did all that could be done. -- Ronald Reagan

We had better make our destiny count. Get involved, speak, write and demand results. Our future literally depends on it.

---
If you can be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you can be told what to say or think. Defend your constitutionally protected rights, no one else will do it for you.

http://rhawk301.blogspot.com/
rhawk301-at-gmail.com

Friday, February 29, 2008

McCain: Conservative or Globalist?

The “Global Tax”, Global warming Carbon Tax, and other globalist agendas are not just reserved for liberals. John McCain has some extremely unsettling speeches. The people that are congregating around McCain are getting scarier and scarier.

It seems here that John McCain wants to yet again make another globalist organization like the UN. How is that going to help anything? We need to get rid of the UN and simply create world-wide trade partnerships which is what the Constitution was written to do. We need to start creating larger tariffs for incoming products and force a manufacturing base back into the United States.

Don’t get me started on the world-wide Bush cartel, but McCain is really bad news. What we really need at this point is for Ron Paul and Huckabee to do a lot better and perhaps we can get a brokered convention. If Huckabee drops out, then McCain will surely get all the delegates.

http://www.buchanan.org/blog/?p=940

February 11, 2008

McCain: Conservative or Globalist?

posted by Linda

McCain speech on CFR website:

“We cannot build an enduring peace based on freedom by ourselves. Nor do we want to. The Declaration of Independence proclaimed our duty to pay decent respect to the opinions of mankind.”

“We should go further and start bringing democratic peoples and nations from around the world into one common organization, a worldwide League of Democracies.”

“This League of Democracies would not supplant the United Nations or other international organizations. It would complement them. … If I am elected president, I will call a summit of the world’s democracies in my first year to seek the views of my democratic counterparts and begin exploring the practical steps necessary to realize this vision.

… But if we are to lead responsibly, our friends and allies must see us as responsible nation, concerned not only about our own well-being but about the health of the world’s economy and the future of our planet.

…This is not idealism, my friends. It is the truest kind of realism. Today as in the past, our interests are inextricably linked to the global progress of our ideals.”

Read the full text at the Council on Foreign Relations website…

Our thanks to D. Stapp for the update.

Thursday, February 14, 2008

At least 17 shot in Illinois university class (AND related articles)

OK, so here is a Reuters article about the gun attacks at the University. Check out the legal brief next filed 2 days ago by a legal team trying to repeal the DC gun ban. The article at the end explains how todays shooting was the "...fourth at a U.S. school within a week." How "convienient" this attack happened today.


Thu Feb 14, 2008 6:52pm EST

By Andrew Stern

CHICAGO (Reuters) - A man opened fire with a shotgun in a crowded lecture hall at Northern Illinois University on Thursday, wounding at least 17 people before killing himself, authorities said.

Witnesses said terrified students, some of them bleeding profusely from neck and other wounds after being hit by buckshot, fled the classroom after the gunman began shooting seemingly at random from near the front of the room.

"Some girl got hit in the eye, a guy got hit in the leg," George Gaynor, a student who was in the hall told the Northern Star, the student newspaper on the campus.

He said "a skinny white guy with a stocking cap on" began shooting about five minutes before a class on ocean science was to have ended. Another witness said the man suddenly appeared at the front of the auditorium carrying a shotgun and perhaps another weapon and began firing into the audience and at the teacher.

Within two hours of the shooting police said the area had been secured. They said the gunman had killed himself.

"Campus police report that the immediate danger has passed," the Web site of Northern Illinois University in DeKalb said on its Web site. "The gunman is no longer a threat."

A hospital near the campus said 17 people had been treated for gunshot wounds.

One student told local radio that roughly 140 students were in the classroom when the man opened fire. Ambulances swarmed onto the 25,000-student campus, which is 65 miles west of downtown Chicago, and classes were canceled, the university said on its Web site.

One male student said he was sitting in the class, taking notes when the gunman entered from behind a curtain, firing a shotgun. "He was just shooting, and people were screaming."

Kristina Balluff, a student, said the gunman was dressed in black pants, shirt, and was wearing some sort of mask. He came onto the classroom stage, which is elevated above where the students sit, and began firing.

"I looked at this girl next to me and actually said, 'is this real?' I think the professor ... ducked out of the way."

U.S. schools and colleges have suffered a series of shooting incidents in recent years.

A university in Blacksburg, Virginia, Virginia Tech, became the site of the deadliest rampage in U.S. history in April last year when a gunman killed 32 people and himself.

(Reporting by Andrew Stern and Michael Conlon; Editing by Stuart Grudgings)



Gunman kills 5 in Illinois university classroom

BELLEVUE, Wash., Feb 12, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- The Second Amendment Foundation has filed an amicus curiae brief in District of Columbia v Heller, the appeal of the landmark case that overturned the district's handgun ban on the grounds that it unconstitutionally violates the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

Written by attorney Nelson Lund at the George Mason University School of Law, the brief has already earned praise of veteran Second Amendment authority David Kopel, who noted in remarks on a popular Second Amendment website, "If you want to read a model Supreme Court brief, this is the brief to read."

In the brief, Lund notes that the Second Amendment right of the people to keep and bear arms would remain even if the militia were disbanded.

"Our 48-page brief is tightly written, and it refutes the contentions by anti-gunners that the Second Amendment only protects some right of the states to maintain militias," said SAF founder Alan Gottlieb. "The brief, which can be read on our website at www.saf.org, gets right to the heart of this case. We also note that the opposition arguments are absurd, and explain why."

SAF's brief further reminds the court that "In liberal theory, the most fundamental of all rights is the right of self defense." It also notes that "the people" referred to in the Second Amendment "has always been a much larger body of individuals than the militia."

"Congress cannot abolish this constitutional right of the people by abolishing the militia," notes Lund in the brief. "Neither can the right be limited to contexts in which its exercise contributes to the functioning of an organized militia that Congress is not even required to maintain."

"While anti-gun extremists are beating drums about the downfall of civilization if the high court upholds the individual right," Gottlieb stated, "we believe that the time has come for the Second Amendment to take its place as the Constitution's insurance policy against tyranny and as our guardian against unjust laws that leave us defenseless against a growing criminal element."

The Second Amendment Foundation is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 600,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.

SOURCE Second Amendment Foundation

Copyright © 2008 PR Newswire. All rights reserved




Gunman kills 4 in Illinois university classroom
By Russ Britt, MarketWatch
Last update: 9:13 p.m. EST Feb. 14, 2008

LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) -- A gunman opened fire in a crowded lecture hall at Northern Illinois University Thursday afternoon, killing four people and wounding as many as 14 others before he shot and killed himself, according to media reports.

The shooter, a thin white male dressed in black and wearing a stocking cap, went into Cole Hall on the campus in DeKalb, entered a science class through an emergency door and began shooting at students and a teacher, the Washington Post reported, citing accounts on a local radio station and in the student newspaper.

The 25,000-student campus, about 65 miles west of Chicago, was closed immediately after the shootings and classes were cancelled for the remainder of Thursday and all of Friday, according to reports.

NIU campus police chief Donald Grady confirmed the four victims' deaths following a news conference, Associated Press reported. The dead students and the gunman weren't immediately identified.

Brady said the gunman wasn't a student at the school and that police had no apparent motive, AP reported.

Grady told reporters the gunman apparently had a shotgun and two handguns, including a Glock, but that only one of the handguns was immediately recovered, the Post reported. He said the shooter, who appeared to have been acting alone, had not expended all of his ammunition, according to the Post report.

It wasn't immediately known if the four students died in the classroom or at an area hospital, nor was it known if any of the other wounded students had life-threatening injuries.
The university initially reported 18 students were injured, four critically, and taken to a local hospital, according to media reports. According to an alert posted on a university Web site nearly two hours after the shooting, eight of the victims were in stable condition and six others were in good condition.

The shooting occurred about 3 p.m., according to reports.

NIU was closed for a day during final exams in December after campus police discovered racial slurs and references to last year's shooting at Virginia Tech University scrawled on a bathroom wall in a dormitory.

In a Dec. 11 message to all students, NIU President John G. Peters said the graffiti was considered a "credible threat," the Post reported. "Events of the past several days remind all of us that community is more than a word, and that threats against a group are a threat to us all," Peters wrote.

Peters said school officials had ordered a police presence around all final exam sites after the campus reopened, according to the Post report.

In April, a student named Seung-Hui Cho rampaged across the Virginia Tech campus, killing 33 people before shooting and killing himself.

The NIU shooting was the fourth at a U.S. school within a week.

On Feb. 8, a woman killed two students before shooting and killing herself at Louisiana Tech in Baton Rouge. On Monday, a high school student in Memphis, Tennessee was charged with first-degree murder after he allegedly shot fellow student during gym class. And on Tuesday a 15-year-old was shot at a junior high school in Oxnard, California, and was later declared brain dead.

End of Story

Russ Britt is the Los Angeles bureau chief for MarketWatch.

Monday, December 10, 2007

RE: Flu shots

Our pediatrician does not recommend Thimerosal based vaccines. He does give us options, and suggests waiting between shots. The other important thing we found out is that kids should be really healthy when getting any vaccination, and not have like colds or be “under the weather” of any sort. This gives them better chances on bouncing back from the vaccine itself. Jake for instance has allergies, including peanuts, which gives him a disadvantage to certain medicines as we have found out.

Even though there is conflicting information, most of it is coming from the government and the big pharma industries. I keep asking people if they believe big pharma is looking out for the safety of the kids or for profits? The CDC and FDA are simply wanting to stem the tide of millions of families if in fact bad information is revealed like in the case of Merck Viox, or the Bayer Hemophiliac disaster.

We are being cautious none-the-less.

Friday, November 16, 2007

halturnershow.com Amero information fake!

The Hal Turner Show somehow manages to get peoples attention with these "ground breaking" stories all the time. Hal Turner is nothing but a fraud artist taking advantage of people who do not do their research properly. I would equate Hal Turner as the left version of Glenn Beck or Bill O'Reilly. These people subvert information and make NO attempt to tell people they are transmitting false claims.

Take for instance the Amero claims on Hal's website. The coins themselves are "fantasy coins" that come from dc-coin.

The Amero is real, the North American Union is real, and Hal Turner has once again managed to convince people the Denver Mint is making these coins. Well, not these coins Hal. They are made out of copper and silver by dc-coin selling non-US mint collectors coins.

Engadget blew the Hal Turner "Keyboard Logging" scandal wide open, and there are multiple instances on the net disproving this obvious lie. Of course the images he links to are all gone now, but I still remember the story. However, our friends at archive.org captured this data permanently. Dans Data review has a great Keyghost Logger write-up.

Whatever Hal Turner is up to, its not the truth. I personally want to listen to someone that at least gets the information right most of the time and that I NEVER catch lying on purpose. Why not take Alex Jones Infowars for instance? This guy always has good information and I have never once found he is subverting the facts. Is Alex passionate and does he use information to his advantage on his show, yes, but never flat out fabricates or lies about stuff.

Listen to Hal Turner if you have a passion for funny, well derived fictional stories like the Onion.

Sunday, November 04, 2007

Remember this November 5th for the Ron Paul Revolution

Remember this November 5th for the Ron Paul Revolution

Please join us this November 5th for the largest one day political donation event in history. Our goal is to bring together 100,000 people to donate $100 each, creating a one day donation total of $10,000,000.

Please subscribe via feedburner below to confirm your commitment to donate. Each day you'll receive an email with our total number of subscribers. In this way we will know exactly where we stand in our efforts. Our goal is 100,000 subscribers.

Please subscribe now. Please spread the word. Thank you.

RonPaul2008.com

Remember, Remember,

This 5th of November,
The patriot money-bomb plot.

For Ron Paul's the reason,
That this campaign season,
We're giving it all that we've got.

Send one hundred dollars,
And tell talk show callers,
To answer sweet liberty's call.

Remember, Remember,
This 5th of November,
Give one hundred bucks to Ron Paul.

- Darwin Scott Wycherley

Monday, August 27, 2007

Why I oppose Ron Paul

I got a response letter from a netizen about Ron Paul. I thought it important to understand the ideas and thought process behind someone who does not support Ron Paul. This country and Ron Paul especially engage in the idea of free speech. Although a free platform is not required, I thought this post was especially thought through and requires a response. Please by all means respond to this post with your thoughts and counter-arguments. Please keep the thread without insults people.

This is posted on digg.com digg story

---

by Kursio
published 8/27/2007

I think that Ron Paul’s policy of non-intervention, withdrawal from Iraq and immigration stances are good ideas, not to mention that he brings a lot of hope and inspiration for many people and get usually politically inactive young people to take part in campaigning. However I don’t like his libertarian domestic policies (except promoting state’s right and standing up for constitution) that would effectively abolish most federal programs which help the poor and low-income people the most while Paul would want toreduce regulations on enterprises to a minimum: government power would change to corporation power at worst, in the long-shot. His voting record is clearly anti-environmentalist which I see highly irresponsible in the time of global warming, he opposed raise on the minimum wage that would raise the quality of life of the poorest workers and he opposes right for abortion (though he would let the states decide), not to mention that he could reduce foreign aid as he sees it more harmful than helpful. When looking his voting record he hasn’t fought against corruption that much but on the contrary wanted to maintain it by voting NO on campaign finance reform banning soft-money contributions, voted NO on banning soft money and issue ads, and promotes UNLIMITED campaign contributions; with full disclosure. This would lead to even more corrupted politics and money would get even bigger role, effectively maintaining and strengthening two-party system. Furthermore, Ron Paul opposes giving a representative who could vote in Congress & electoral vote for over 500 000 D.C. residents, appealing to the Constitution which clearly isn’t flawless when today’s world is concerned. Hisstance in this issue goes against the principles of democracy: every adult citizen counts in the decision-making process.

What comes to Paul’s isolationist foreign policy: withdrawal from international organizations such as WTO, NATO, World Bank and especially the UN (in addition to some free trade treaties) would be showing back to rest of the world while hurting US economic & political interests and strengthening the idea of strong nation states in other countries, and I don’t think that such countries are in anyone’s interests. Lack of cooperation and strong, selfish major powers eventually got the world into WW I and II.International cooperation at political, economic and military level is what brings stability and peace to the world: the EU was established for the very reason for European countries to cooperate with each other, increase commerce, promote common values and stop further wars. Moreover, withdrawal from the UN would mean that the USA wouldn’t take part in the peacekeeping operations anymore.

Ron Paul is seen as a candidate of true change but if that’s the case, why he doesn’t promote abolishment of ”first-past-the-post” election system which effectively created & maintains corrupted and undemocratic two-party dominance and replace it with a multi-party system, not to mention the Electoral College that isn’t needed anymore? Why he doesn’t actively campaign against the power of lobbyists in Washington? Why he doesn’t talk about electoral reform in general? I take my information about Paul mainly from http://www.ontheissues.org/ but have also read ”issues” section from his homepage.

I indeed support Barack Obama for president though I don’t 100% agrees with him in issues. He’s not just charismatic & able speaker, he’s also honest, humble and energetic “people’s man” who has good record in fighting against corruption & lobbyists while promoting voting rights & bi-partisan approach. He’s relatively young in the US politics and as black he would significantly increase racial equality & tolerance, if not by legislation at least by attitudes. His plan for withdrawal from Iraq is realistic like his new foreign policy proposals which mainly emphasize cooperation over using the force ofarms. His health care & energy plans are seemingly good & extensive, and he’s Washington outsider compared to other major candidates (except John Edwards). Obama brings hope & change while he has realistic chances to actually make it to the WhiteHouse unlike Ron Paul in current conditions. I actually think that most Paul-supporters will vote for Obama if he’s nominated in the Democratic Convention.

It’s true that Ron Paul’s presence in the internet is extensively strong and young people show him strong support but this isn’t enough. Ron Paul lacks a lot of campaign money compared to front-runners to get face & policy recognition, the mass media largely ignores him and polls don’t look that good. Some people point out that Ron Paul has almost as much campaign money as Mitt Romney after expenses but this is a false comparison: Romney has got a lot of media visibility with his money unlike Paul who has used it pretty carefully. Though Paul won New Hampshire straw-poll it must be noted that the poll didn’t hold much significance compared to Iowa straw-poll, and internetpolls give very biased & even false picture as people can vote more than once in most of them. Not to mention that strong hype & campaign activity in the streets and in the internet may not mean a lot of actual support: Governor Howard Dean had stronggrassroots support and internet presence in 2004 but he came down like a janitor from the roof in the Primaries. I think Ron Paul will make it to 4th or 5th place but he won’t win the primaries: people aren’t completely fed up with the Democrats & Republicans whohave many different candidates, the mass media calls the shots and money talks, not to mention that there’s no visible crisis in the USA in the eyes of most people that would require totally new candidate for president. It can also be questioned if there are thatmany voters in the USA who actually agree with Paul’s libertarian policies.

What comes to the Council of Foreign Relations: it’s a political think-tank, a policy discussion club with a lot of influence & also secrecy surrounding it, agreeto that, but as far as I’m concerned it’s still not some secret conspiracy society that promotes North American Union under one government: increasing economic and security policy cooperation isn’t the same thing, and pointing out that X actually means Zdoesn’t make it true. There’s not even a mention about the one world government like many want to argue, and there’s no actual proof that Barack Obama or evenother presidential candidates would be actual members as the CFR doesn’t publish its membership records anywhere and speaking in CFR event doesn’t make aperson a member, even active one: Youtube videos and conspiracy sites are hardly credible sources. For example many Germans were members of the NSDAP during1930’s & WW II just to help their careers or not stand out from the pack. Furthermore, the policy statements & programs are written by a small group of CFR insider members and those statements & programs aren’t voted on in some national CFR convention to get approval from CFR members. Whole hype around the CFR makes me wonder: is this really the only major argument that many Paul-supporters make against frontrunners andother candidates? I hope not.

Furthermore I would like to add that even if, by some miracle, Ron Paul would be elected to become the president of the United States; he would hardly get much done if he would stand as firmly behind his principles as he has to this point. Legislation initiatives would get grid-locked, Paul’s vetoes repealed by Congressional majority, and Paul’s legislationinitiatives would hardly pass in addition to fact that mass media would bombard maverick president Paul. What this would cause would be a better cooperation andunderstanding between the Democrats & Republicans while strengthening support for third party and independent candidates which is a good thing.

Nevertheless, my main concern in this whole Ron Paul-issue was that no matter who supports what candidate, is that some people spread negative, hateful and even false information around from other candidates and paint devils into walls while taking noopposing, not even tiny critical stance towards their own candidate: in this aspect I just happened to read comments of Ron Paul’s videos and decided to comment a little bit in trying to break this image of Ron Paul as some Vice Jesus for many of his supporters. Isnegative campaigning really bringing about hope & change? The Paul supporters should make positive campaign emphasizing Paul’s values instead of furiously attacking against other candidates: criticizing others and attacking others are two different things.

P.S. I remembered that Iraq was going to switch to euros but wasn’t able to fully carry it out until the Coalition invaded at 2003.

read more digg story

Sunday, June 17, 2007

RE: Ed and Mrs. Elaine Brown - NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST

NOTICE AND DEMAND

TO CEASE AND DESIST


TO: Mr. Stephen R. Monier

c/o Office of the U.S. Marshal

Warren B. Rudman U.S. Courthouse

55 Pleasant Street, Suite 207

Concord 03301

NEW HAMPSHIRE, USA

FROM: Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964(a), Rotella v. Wood


DATE: June 15, 2007 A.D.

SUBJECT: Mr. Ed and Mrs. Elaine Brown

Greetings Mr. Monier:

This is to inform you formally and officially that my office legally represents the United States ex rel. in Tenth Circuit appeal #07-2017.

In that case, extensive verified evidence has already been admitted into that Court’s record, proving conclusively that there is no Statute at Large creating a specific liability for income taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”).

The alleged “liability” was fabricated by the Internal Revenue Service, but there is no corresponding Act of Congress creating that specific liability for any income taxes imposed by IRC subtitle A.

Accordingly, even if the IRS were a de jure service, bureau, office or other subdivision of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are NOT), they would still not have any authority to create a tax liability by means of regulations published in the Federal Register. See 31 U.S.C. 333; Commissioner v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87 (1959).

Moreover, you are hereby served with formal NOTICE that the constitutionality of IRC subtitle A, the federal Jury Selection and Service Act and the Act of June 25, 1948, has now been properly and formally challenged in that Tenth Circuit Appeal.

In the first instance, it is now the position of the United States ex rel. that the Jury Selection and Service Act is unconstitutional because it expressly discriminates against State Citizens by requiring that all jury candidates be federal citizens. The U.S. Supreme Court has already held that such “class discrimination” in jury selection is unconstitutional. There are two (2) classes of citizens in America.

Therefore, the Browns were never “indicted” by a lawfully convened federal grand jury, and they were never “convicted” by a lawfully convened federal trial jury. Both panels of federal citizens were not lawfully convened federal juries, in the first instance.

My office has not yet had an opportunity to review any of the court pleadings filed in the Browns’ case. Nevertheless, our 17 years of experience in State and federal litigation inform us that the U.S. Department of Justice routinely institutes criminal proceedings on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. However, the latter entity incorporated twice in Delaware, and both of those foreign corporations have now been revoked by the Delaware Secretary of State.

To make matters much worse, the long-standing rule in all federal litigation is that statutes conferring original jurisdiction on Federal District Courts must be strictly construed. The Article IV United States District Court has no criminal jurisdiction whatsoever. The general grant of criminal jurisdiction at 18 U.S.C. 3231 confers original jurisdiction upon the Article III District Courts of the United States, not on the Article IV United States District Courts.

We have enclosed a few key documents to substantiate every statement above, and full details are readily available from supporting links and related resources in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet here:

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/

DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST

Accordingly, formal demand is hereby made of you and all of your associates, accomplices and accessories of whatever description, to cease and desist immediately from any further attempts to apprehend the Browns or to trespass upon their fundamental Rights or private property in any manner whatsoever.

NOTICE OF INTENT

If you willfully violate this lawful NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST, this is our formal NOTICE to you of our intent to lodge a VERIFIED CRIMINAL COMPLAINT, ON INFORMATION specifically naming you as a principal in a conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activities in connection with the Browns and in connection with any other attempts by your office to enforce a non-existent liability for IRC subtitle A “income taxes”, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1962.

Notice to agents is notice to principals.

Notice to principals is notice to agents.

Thank you for your immediate cooperation.

Sincerely yours,

/s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell

Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S.

Private Attorney General, Criminal Investigator and

Federal Witness: 18 U.S.C. 1510, 1512-13, 1964(a)

http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/...


List of Hard Copy Attachments:

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/nad06.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/subpoena.oneill.1.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/delivery.instructions.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/subpoena.oneill.2.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/subpoena.oneill.3.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/green.card.gif

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/reminder.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/...

http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/cracking.title.28.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/us-v-usa.htm

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/...

http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/williamson2/appeal/...

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

What happened to the networksolutions.com root cert?

Has anyone seen the Root cert called "UTN-USERFirst-Hardware"? Or for that matter an EV (Extended Validation) certificate? It seems that Network Solutions has somehow changed their certificate model to using this UTN usertrust.com cert Root certificate path.



read more | digg story

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Goodling Admits Her Partisan Hirings Were ‘Illegal’

"In her opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee today, Monica Goodling — the Justice Department’s former White House liaison — admitted that she had “taken inappropriate political considerations into account” while hiring career employees at the Department."

Karl Rove and AG Gonzales are the power players behind all this stuff. As people start getting burned around them, we will start to see a flood of fire extinguishers coming out and whistle blowers. Even Bush had to hire and fire several generals and other cabinet posts before he found just the right suck-ups. What we have is a dictator with spineless ninny minions lurking around the Executive Branch now.

and because of all these lies, I need to talk about how to fix it:

I have been watching sessions on C-SPAN and you should really hear how the Congress feels about the President. Its not just the Democrats, but some Republicans are also not very happy about what is going on. Yes, there are still some nut-job war mongers lingering around but not too many any more. (but then again, who isn't going to vote for more money for our troops so they don't starve).

I personally feel that we should have a separate funding process for ongoing operations, so our troops get clothes, bullet proof vests, bullets, food, etc. Then we have discussions on funding for extra war effort and time lines, etc, which I think will never get past the Congress. They take too much effort in all the ninnying and cowing to the President. Who is going to finally take some action and stop this crap from happening? We need Ron Paul in there.

Fixing a lot of our monetary policy, lobbying, corporatism, and the military industrial complex problems will go a long way to getting America back again. Ron Paul addresses most of these topics.

read more | digg story

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Will Republicans Destroy Themselves Before They Destroy America?

"As everyone except for a dwindling band of Bush supporters now knows, the US is in a terrible situation in Iraq from which it cannot extract itself. For Bush and Cheney, their own pride and delusion are more compelling than US casualties, the destruction of Iraq and its people, and the inflaming of sectarian strife and anti-American violence..."

All I need to say, is please start watching C-SPAN. I have been watching the "Today in Washington" shows, and the "Tonight in Washington" show. There is some really good dialogue going on here. You will find out that the Congress is really distressed about the President's actions and want things to change.

The legislative process is slow, but as long as good people keep on fighting change will happen.

read more | digg story

Friday, April 06, 2007

How The RIAA Destroyed The Record Store

"Owners of little record store detail the evil machinations of the recording industry."

This is the best article I have read of late about the music sales industry. I think they hit it right on the head. Who would have known that greedy music bigwig bastards by stuffing their pockets would kill the industry? Ok, that was a little sarcastic, but come on, if you only look after yourself you will get whats coming to you.

The RIAA needs to immediately and unconditionally accept online forms of music, P2P and bring back the 80's and early 90's style of music marketing. The record stores will slowly come back. Stores such as Wal Mart will also need to have brand new distribution agreements forbidding the under-sale of music, and no more exclusive boxing deals. Multi-national giganto-corporations are where the problems are at too, not just the music industry.

read more | digg story

Federal marshals arrest wrong man in S.J.

According to the article "A San Jose man wrongfully arrested on sex charges by the U.S. Marshals Service was released from Santa Clara County Jail late Thursday night."

It also seems
"The name, address, drivers license and birthday matched up information provided by the Prince George County Police Department."

However, the most shocking thing buried in the story is this
"Sgt. Dalia Rodriguez of the sheriff's office said once Glover told the court that he was not the person in question, authorities contacted law enforcement officials in Maryland and requested a photograph of the man wanted for the sexual assaults." "By looking at the photo, we believe at this point the person they arrested was not the right person," Rodriguez said."

Lets see here, you are a Federal Agent, assigned the task of hunting down a sex criminal and the first thing you do is NOT request a photograph of the person you will be arresting. But wait, they already said they had the drivers license information.

Please, if you are law enforcement, take a moment and make sure the people you will be arresting, breaking into their homes, storming apartments with SWAT teams or the like, that you actually know what is going on.

Those who are in law enforcement are supposed to be there because they have training, and they have studied for it, and they have experience. They are also supposed to be public servants. Coming up with an oops, sorry, just doesn't cut it any more.

Don't keep doing stupid things, or you will end up on my jackboots in America blog.

Friday, March 30, 2007

oops, we are the jackboot brigade and we bungled another warrant...

Yet again, another example of our men in blue dressed down in riot gear serving a warrant. Didn't they surveil the house "just a little"? If you are going to serve a warrant in FULL RIOT GEAR there should be some kind of protocol to do some surveillance first and make sure the people in question are actually there.

read more | digg story

jackboots of the future - Death Squad in Delaware

"An Iraq veteran who served two tours is gunned down by a militarized police force---in the US of A! Why be surprised? We spend approximately 50% of the total worldwide outlays for military expenditures. Do you really think a civilized, peace-loving republic would countenance such a state of affairs?"

Take a look at this article. It has several main stream media references, and is well written. It is about an Iraq war vet basically surveilled and murdered for some reason.

Although these militarized police events are limited to large areas like Virginia, Florida, Texas, etc, they are slowly progressing to a police state throughout the country. This is a really good example about what I have been talking about. The police have absolutely no reason, authority, or should never become this violent. This type of story goes well beyond police duties, and into the realm of assassination with prejudice.

Stick this together with the many “S.W.A.T.” team raids for simply warrants, and you have yourself some pretty deadly situations.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w10.html

read more | digg story

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

14 year old Texas girl gets 7 years in prison for shoving Hall Monitor.

"In Texas, a white teenager burns down her family's home and receives probation. A black one shoves a hall monitor and gets 7 years in prison. The youth had no prior arrest record, and the hall monitor--a 58-year-old teacher's aide--was not seriously injured. But Shaquanda was tried in March 2006 in the town's juvenile court, convicted of assault."

This is a statement on our schools, not racism. Any little infraction is now considered a felony. They want to get everyone in the system, and better yet NOT have to deal with these kids again.

If you glide through school accepting ALL forms of conditioning and brainwashing, you might, just maybe survive the experience. Of course you will be scarred for life with no real hope of understanding the true society as a whole. You will only see things from the establishment viewpoint.

I would look into whether this school prescribes to a zero-tolerance policy or not. If they do, you should take your kids out immediately and have them transferred to a school which does not have one. Kids will be kids, and we MUST train them to be civil.

A 14 year old "pushing" anyone would be considered bad behavior and should be written up as such. It would be the parents responsibility to correct such action. If this girl continues to be aggressive, then you take more appropriate action, but NEVER jail. Jail is for hardened criminals who cannot be simply rehabilitated using normal society methods.

read more | digg story

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Daylight Spending Time? Candy Lobby groups making our jobs harder?

"DST doesn’t really save any energy. It makes us spend more money, and requires us to buy more candy for Halloween. Now, kids will trick-or-treat on daylight time and the candy companies are thrilled. Candy Lobby groups of all things have been hitting our Senetors hard since 1985 for this to happen. Is this what we have come to?"

Seriously, should we still allow these lobby groups to make bad policy like this? Our company alone spent a couple weeks, hundreds of man hours, and perhaps thousands of dollars in lost productivity to make sure all our network servers, workstations and various appliances were all up to date.

All I am going to say is that we need more transparency in laws which get signed. We should expect to know who originally requested the legislation and where the money is which is funding the research and moving the bill through Congress.

http://podcasts.autobloggreen.com/.../

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/.../

http://www.pbs.org/.../

http://www.chatterblogging.com/.../

http://www.google.com/.../


read more | digg story

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

Chavez: "CIA Out to Kill Me"

"President Hugo Chavez on Sunday said he believes enemies including the CIA are out to kill him, and called U.S. diplomat John Negroponte a 'professional killer.'"

Cheney's five big goals getting into office was to 1) Invade Afghanistan 2) Invade Iraq 3) Invade Iran with nukes 4) Kill Chavez take over country with a puppet government 5) Use above reasons to block oil production, run up prices and make tons of contractor investments in middle east (primarily in Iran). Just read PNAC documents and neo-con agendas for proof. Its all laid out and has been executed throughout the last 6 years. Paul Wolfowitz in now head of World Bank, neo-con leaders are being replaced in all factes of the government by executive order.

Maybe this Libby thing will put a perspective on everything.

read more | digg story

Monday, March 05, 2007

ACLU sues Bush administration over removal of Activists; Bouncers on Trial

"The ACLU has looked into whether there was a pattern of illegally preventing critics from speaking at Bush public forums."

"Free Speech Zones" were actually started in force by Clinton. Bush simply took it to a new level. Now keep in mind this is the Secret Service under orders from the Executive Branch, but still the same thing. I have done a fair amount of research into this, and it seems that any level of dissent whether signage, t-shirts, or speech has been banned into free speech zones are altogether removed from appearances by any Executive Branch and for that matter current administration events. So you basically have tons of "Bush lovers" waving fake Chinese-made flags praising Bush all the time, as being reported by the media.

Is this Bush doing this? Probably not, it is the same NWO and fascist leaders who run this country. Keep in mind that the Bush family is so disconnected with the American people that I doubt they would understand dissent if someone presented it to their faces. The corporate lobby groups, and Neo-conservative leaders in power seem to do a great job of shielding our president and many parts of this government from looking upon reality. All you need is some very targeted prompting to the secret service from them to spring into action and remove "troublemakers" or "possibly security threats" from the crowd.

What we need is for tons of American citizens who feel strongly about the problems this country is facing to show up at rallies and any Bush cabinet member event. This includes Cheney, Bush, DOD, and congressional events. Show up with Bush supporting signs, and Bush supporting t-shirts. Then all you do is put your real sign and t-shirt underneath. Once Bush, Cheney or whomever show up and are in direct line of sight, everyone pull off the fake signs, and remove your fake t-shirts to expose the real message. By using perfectly legal subversion we should be able to show them what are message is.

Plus, it doesn't give time for the Secret Service or anyone, including the press to react fast enough. Each of these events will make the front page and nightly news.

read more | digg story