Sunday, November 20, 2016

California Gun Laws, assault weapons ban and the future

Here in California we don't have a second amendment, we have a privilege to carry guns set by the fascist dictatorship which is California.

The Constitution of the United States clearly says:
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
OK, so what part of "shall not be infringed" [1] [2] [3] doesn't make it to the BATF and Sacramento? Or get a book about the matter... [1] [2] better yet, get a pocket constitution (Citizens Rule Book) and read it.

Perhaps they use the White House version of the 2nd amendment as their guide?

The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms.
Or Perhaps Cornell, well they specifically put a header into their text warning people the 2nd amendment is "under debate".
The Second Amendment has most recently been interpreted to grant the right of gun ownership to individuals for purposes that include self-defense. At first it was thought to apply only to the Federal government, but through the mechanism of the Fourteenth Amendment, it has been applied to the states as well.
Review the following:

Text of the CA Senate Bill 880

and its so technical, you need several good reviews to even understand what its about.  The bottom line, is I am pretty sure that law enforcement will ALWAYS have the ability to confiscate anything you have and use the courts to sort it out.   In this way in California you have no gun rights, just a slinking, constant fear you might have trouble if you carry, transport, or even get a hint of storing a gun.

Cal Gun Laws
CA Bans bullet buttons
Bullet Button Reloaded
Gun Fighter Tactical

Cal Forum

and Cal Guns Facebook page

Comments archived from Reddit

Genesis CNC


Buy more lowers

Bullet Button Reloaded, circumvents law, disables magazine release

Sacramento Bee explanation of new gun laws on assault weapons
Being a California gun owner just got more complicated.

Bolstering a body of firearms laws already considered among the nation’s strongest, Gov. Jerry Brown last week signed a half-dozen bills to regulate ammunition sales, ban large-capacity clips and quick-reloading devices and clamp down on lending weapons, among other things.

Some hunters and shooters have reacted with a mix of dismay and confusion, wondering what they will have to do to remain law-abiding citizens and asking if they will need to change their habits.

“I haven’t broken any laws. I’m a Boy Scout. For 20 years I’ve made every effort to stay completely legal because gun rights are so important to me,” said John Spier, a competitive shooter who lives in Visalia. “These laws are going to affect me and those like me a lot more than they’re going to affect criminals.”

Here are answers to some of the more common questions and concerns that arose in interviews with gun owners.
Q: Do I have to get a permit to buy ammunition?
A: No. But under Senate Bill 1235 as of July 2019 you will need to pass a background check, which involves the vendor running your information through a California Department of Justice system to see if you are prohibited from owning guns (for example, because of a violent felony). If not, you should be clear to buy.
Q: What if I go hunting across state lines and buy ammo there?
A: Let’s say you travel to Oregon for some duck hunting and buy boxes of ammunition while outside of California. You can bring at most 50 rounds back in to the state. Any more than that and you could be hit with a misdemeanor.
Q: Who’s going to enforce that?
A: The same law enforcement agencies like sheriffs, police officers and Department of Justice agents who already enforce gun laws. For example, the department already works to intercept people who cannot own guns in California but try to get them across the border from other states.
Hunters might already be familiar with Department of Agriculture border checkpoints, which exist to ensure people aren’t bringing banned fruit and vegetables, illegally poached game or out-of-state afflictions like chronic wasting disease into California. There is no plan to set up new checkpoints to check whether people are bringing ammunition, but people could face questions about ammo at the agricultural stops.
If you are purchasing ammunition in California, going hunting in another state and then returning with more than 50 rounds, keep a record of the sale to establish it’s on the level.
Q: Can I give or sell my friends and family excess ammunition?
A: You can sell up to 50 rounds a month directly to immediate relatives and give as much as you want to friends or family. You cannot sell to a friend unless the transaction goes through a licensed ammunition dealer or you both are licensed hunters out on a hunt and you don’t sell more than 50 rounds a month.
Q: I own a gun with a detachable magazine. Am I breaking the law?
A: Two bills, Senate Bill 880 and Assembly Bill 1135, sought to close what law enforcement groups and gun control advocates call the “bullet-button” loophole. California law already prohibited assault weapons, defined as those with magazines that can be detached without disassembling the gun or using a tool.
But some gun owners reacted to that by employing so-called “bullet-button” devices that can quickly release spent magazines without running afoul of the ban, seeing as they allow users to eject magazines using tools like another magazine.
The new laws would, as of the start of 2017, ban the sale of semi-automatic, centerfire rifles or semi-automatic pistols that do not have a fixed magazine and also have one from a list of specific design features.
Q: So if I have an old gun that fits that definition, do I have to get rid of it?
A: Not if you bought it between 2001 and 2016. But you will need to register it with the California Department of Justice by the start of 2018. You can find a form online at, and it should cost at most $20.
Both under the old and the new definition, to be banned for sale guns also need to have a characteristic from a list that includes things like a protruding pistol grip, a thumbhole stock, a folding stock, a flash suppressor or a grenade launcher. In other words, what are often referred to as “military-style” features.
So guns like hunting rifles with detachable magazines won’t necessarily be banned, as long as they don’t have one of those “military-style” design features the state uses to define assault weapons.
Q: My dad owns a semi-automatic with a detachable magazine that fits the new definition of an assault weapon. Will I be able to inherit it when he dies or buy it from him?
A: No. Unless he modifies the gun so it’s not longer classified as an assault weapon, that now counts as an illegal sale or transfer.
Q: My hunting company regularly lends customers guns. Is that now illegal?
A: No. Assembly Bill 1511 cracks down on loaning guns, with advocates arguing the practice serves to skirt background check requirements.
But an existing exemption for hunters remains in place, so hunting guides can still lend their customers firearms as part of their businesses if those customers have hunting licenses and only use the guns during the established hunting season.
Family members can lend one another guns provided it doesn’t happen that often: less than six times a year for handguns and, for other guns, if it’s “occasional and without regularity.”
Outside of that, you won’t be able to loan guns to others starting in January 2017.
Q: Some of the guns I use take magazines that carry more than 10 rounds. What do I do with them?
A: Senate Bill 1446 prohibits the possession of magazines that can hold more than 10 rounds as of July 2017. That expands on an existing state law barring the sale and import of such magazines.
So you might need to get rid of old high-volume magazines by destroying them, selling them to licensed gun dealers or handing them in to law enforcement. But, as with the bullet-button bills, there are some exceptions written in.
If you own a gun that only takes such large-capacity magazines, and bought it before the start of 2000, you can keep the magazines that go with it provided you only use them for that gun.
Q: I’m a competitive shooter and use guns with large-capacity magazines. Can I continue practicing my sport in California?
A: Some shooting competitions use guns that accept magazines larger than those California now prohibits. Participants have been able to get around that until now provided their magazines are old enough that they didn’t buy them before California outlawed sales of such magazines.
But now, if your gun can take a lower-capacity magazine, you have to use it while in California.
Jeremy B. White: 916-326-5543@CapitolAlert

Thursday, November 17, 2016

National Socialism (Nazi) and Social Nationalism Explained Easily

I find it interesting in the context of the recent election cycle that Barack Obama would actually come out with the assistance of the national media whore press and suggest that Nations should be careful in support of Nationalist movements [1], linking them to the Nazi movement [2] and related bloodshed.

Supporting a strong country, borders, sustainable economics and wanting the best for your fellow countrymen is not Nazi, nor is it some form of deluded thinking that brought about WWII.  Hitler specifically wanted to establish a "Master Race" or National Eugenics movement, similar to that of the United States at the time [3], he wanted the "Arian Race" to dominate and rejected class mingling.

The Globalist leanings of this establishment president and those around him, and those presidents for the last 27 years is what has been damaging to the United States.   We need far less globalism and more straight forward nationalism in order to support a free and open society.  We need to remove the bonds of crony capitalism, which is fueled by corrupt government.

The Syrian Social Nationalist Party has been blogging about its own struggle in the Middle East, and I would want you to at least read what they have to say, and understand national struggles from different sides.   I can't personally endorse any government or political movement, because I believe in a more John Birch Society view of government.  It is important to note, however, that as government is supposed to preserve your freedom, any attempt to make a people more free and more independent is a good one.
In short, National Socialism and Social Nationalism operate on two separate intellectual planes: the former connects between race and nation and the later discounts any such connection.
In Mein Kampf Hitler stated the basic postulates of the race theory as follows: First, a struggle for the survival of the fittest sets the pace for social progress. This struggle occurs within the race, thus giving rise to a natural elite; it also occurs between races and the cultures that express the inherent natures of different races. Second, hybridization by the intermixture of two races results in the degeneration of the higher race. Third, that all high civilizations or important cultures are the creation of one race, or at most of a few. One particular race singled out is the 'culture-creating Aryan' which, according to Hitler, achieved its superior moral qualities through dutifulness and idealism (honour) rather than intelligence. In this organic conception of life, all history "must be rewritten and reinterpreted in terms of the struggle between the races and their characteristic ideas, or more specifically, as a struggle between the Aryan or culture-creating race and all the lower breeds of mankind."
I also have to point out that Patriotism is a personal struggle for freedom within a National view of your country.  Without a country, we have no firewall against external forces, and left with a global government and global tyranny.  We must erect national borders to sustain people within regional context.   I personally believe there are enough problems dealing with your own government and guarding against tyranny, we don't need to remove all borders.

A website called seems to suggest that Patriotism and Nationalism are much different.
Patriot: Expresses the emotion of love towards his country in a passive way.
Nationalist: Strives for independence and the interests and domination of a nation and expresses his love or concern for the country in an active political way.

This is quite retarded.  A patriot not only can express their views aggressively, but be downright pissed off about the direction their personal freedom is taking when a national government starts to oppress them.  A Patriot is someone who uses national pride and love of country actively, and politically to achieve the goals of freedom.   This milk-toast website, and its author needs to re-think pride in ones own surroundings.
At the core of National Socialism was the Nationalism advocated by the historian Heinrich von Treitschke. A basic theme was Social Darwinism: individuals and nations are both subject to a continuous struggle for life. In this struggle, race is the center of life and all other elements are rated with reference to it. National Socialism claimed that keeping the blood and the race pure is a nation's noblest task. It proclaimed the Germanic race as the new ‘icorpus mysticum’ on which the salvation of the Aryan race and consequently that of the world depended. Accordingly, Nazist policies "figured solely as an expedient intended to improve the Germanic race genetically and to protect it against racial interbreeding which according to the National Socialists, always entails the doctrine of the higher race."

By contrast, Saadeh excluded the notion of race as a criteria of nationality. In one of his most vigorous statements against the national socialist conception of the N.S.D.A.P, he declared: "The alleged purity of the race or the blood of any nation is a groundless myth. It is found only in savage groups, and even there it is rare." For the same reason, Saadeh reproached both Count Gobineau and Chamberlain, the forefathers of National Socialism, and Pascal Mancini who unconsciously lapsed into the use of the catchword race in defining the concept of the nation.

In National Socialism, the national idea lost any pretense of scientific objectivity. This is because there is no correlation between race and national frontiers. More importantly, when seen from a purely social perspective, the nation is not a single race in the scientific sense, but a multiracial society fused together in multitudes. This fusion is a process by which two or more races combine to produce a new whole which is significantly different from each of its parent races, but includes elements from all of them, produced through the stimulation of contact and subsequent internal development.

Another significant difference between National Socialism and Social Nationalism relates to the concept of national history. In National Socialism purity of blood speaks louder than reason, and race is the center of all human history. Ernest Kriek, a National Socialist philosopher at Heidelberg, asserted the contrast as follows: "There has arisen ... blood against formal reason; race against purposeful rationality; honour against profit; unity against individualistic disintegration; martial virtue against bourgeois security; the folk against the individual and the mass."

In Mein Kampf Hitler stated the basic postulates of the race theory as follows: First, a struggle for the survival of the fittest sets the pace for social progress. This struggle occurs within the race, thus giving rise to a natural elite; it also occurs between races and the cultures that express the inherent natures of different races. Second, hybridization by the intermixture of two races results in the degeneration of the higher race. Third, that all high civilizations or important cultures are the creation of one race, or at most of a few. One particular race singled out is the 'culture-creating Aryan' which, according to Hitler, achieved its superior moral qualities through dutifulness and idealism (honour) rather than intelligence. In this organic conception of life, all history "must be rewritten and reinterpreted in terms of the struggle between the races and their characteristic ideas, or more specifically, as a struggle between the Aryan or culture-creating race and all the lower breeds of mankind."

On the contrary, Saadeh regarded racial fusion as one of the driving forces of human history. Although he distinguished between higher and lower civilizations he never lost sight of the common sense approach to the question of race relations. This distinction itself was maintained on the ground of racial hybridization. Higher civilization was thus seen as the product not of racial purity, as the national socialists would have us believe, but of the group's on-going inter-racial mixture, and vice versa in relation to lower civilizations. Moreover, whereas in national socialism the nation, in both its existence and history, is seen in a purely racial sense, in social nationalism, it is based on human as well as geographical factors. "There can be no people," wrote Saadeh, "where there is no land, no society where there is no physical environment, and no history where there is no society."

In short, National Socialism and Social Nationalism operate on two separate intellectual planes: the former connects between race and nation and the later discounts any such connection. While they may be similar in certain limited ways, it must be recognized that, from both a theoretical and practical perspective, a certain correlation exists between all ideologies no matter how far apart they may be. More obvious, at any rate, is the difference between the intrinsic elements of an idea and its extrinsic parts which can become the great enemy of the intrinsic. It is within this context that comparative analysis should take place, not only between National Socialism and Social Nationalism but also between any two ideas.

John Muir Health and Vaccine waiver in California

My continuing fight for getting John Muir Health to give me a simple letter stating that my kids shouldn't get vaccines any more.

From: Lisa McCrary []
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 4:40 PM
To: Sean Ackley
Subject: Letter

The information below is from our in-house legal counsel:

“SB 277 does not mandate that the physician sign the letter.

SB 277 is the bill that actually eliminates the personal beliefs exemption that parents used to rely on to exempt their kids from getting vaccinated in order to attend school. SB 277 does say that in order to exempt a child from the vaccine requirement, a parent needs to submit a written statement from a licensed physician (M.D. or D.O.) which states:
·         That the physical condition or medical circumstances of the child are such that the required immunization(s) is not indicated.
·         Which vaccines are being exempted.
·         Whether the medical exemption is permanent or temporary.
·         The expiration date, if the exemption is temporary.
MDs are NOT required to assist in requests for medical exemptions. They are legally permitted to, but not required to. “

Lisa McCrary
Risk Management Coordinator
Quality Management
John Muir Health
1450 Treat Blvd. Ste.# 300
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
(925) 941-2028 (ph)
(925) 952-2845 (fax)

Wednesday, November 16, 2016

Notes for young adults on elections about history

I recommend printing this out, the more information you read, you might need a reference to take with you. God has been laying this on my heart over many years, and perhaps these events are when I am supposed to start talking about this very publicly at church. is best described as a Communist agitation wing of the billionaire class Communist party, where being Communist is not about being "Red" but about Monopoly Capitalism. Everything we were taught about who our enemies are is wrong, Communists are not the Russians or Red Chinese, but Billionaires like George Soros [1], Prince Philip (English Royalty), Bill Gates (and foundation) and families like the Saxe-Coberg-Gotha, Vanderbilts, Carnegies and Rockefellers and others who want to rule the world through globalism. They use covert-funded groups like, Weather Underground, Stand-up PAK, Media Matters, and Americans United for Change to subvert the very fabric of our nation.

The Clintons And Soros Launch America's Purple Revolution

Zero Hedge is a news/financial website which is very trustworthy for providing links and facts

When dealing with such violent thoughts about people voting and our government, you need to ask questions. My hope is that discussion can be raised, maybe even with parents wanting to discuss these subject independently knowing their kids are asking these types of questions. Is it possible to reach kids through their popular media (pop culture) and through their friends? Can you influence them in such a way the simple act of asking questions and planting seeds makes a difference?

1) Do you think that 1/2 the people in the United States are racist, sexist, xenophobic, homophobic and bigots? That seems like a large percentage of the country, where people have large amounts of land.

NOTE: As the above, do you believe these same 1/2 of the United States wants all the Latinos and Muslims to be deported, only to have a White America? Do you think Trump even has the legal capability and physical law enforcement ability to follow-through with the perceived notion he "might" deport a bunch of people? Are they citizens? Are they here legally, documented, illegally? 

Do you know what the immigration policies are of Mexico, Guatemala, El Savador, Jamaica, Hawaii (test question), Canada and the United States?

United States:

Do we have a country? Should we have immigration, migration, social security, health and work laws? Should we just let as many people under any circumstances come here and do what they want?

Should we require citizen status to get public benefits, food stamps, public assistance, social security, pay taxes, drivers license, vote?

For home work, read Cloward and Piven strategy to break-down the United States

2) These people voted against a woman, because they are sexist? Is it possible there are other reasons for them voting this way? Could they want a different outcome for the country, not previously happening? Could a silent majority of people in many outlying parts of the country have finally got sick and tired of the way things were being run in the country?

NOTE: For any of the policies discussed by Donald Trump do you actually know what they are? Do you just get your thinking from the TV and Media? Where? From whom?

3) Even if the above is true, or partially true, will violence changes people's thoughts? Or make them dig in more? Offer examples of when violence changes people's thinking.

Why would you vote for a liar, criminal, drug dealer and documented satanist (Clinton) over a media-suggested womanizer and bigot, if they actually do what they say? Couldn't you at least hold the bigot to the fire and force him to honor the laws of the land? Would you expect a known criminal and liar to change? Can a bigot change? (I don't suggest Trump is those things, but certainly is a narcissist).

4) What is the outcome of violence? Could it in fact turn back on the people creating violence, be imprisoned or at the least have life-long hate against others?

5) What could possibly be a way to make change? How about getting upset and angry and go out and talk with people, find out what they think.

6) non-violent protests have happened for quite some time, including Ghandi and the start of the Occupy movement (before the violent ones).

7) Is the media manipulated or subverting the truth? If so, how could this make you think or feel differently?

If you can be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you can be told what to say or think. (or in this case feel and do and create action) i.e. mind control

NOTE: Do we have a democracy? How does that work? Do you know what a Republic is? Is America actually run differently than mob rule? What is mob rule, and is it effective? How might a democracy work differently than by running a country by laws, rules and consideration of a Republic?

9) What could be the reason it might be required to sway a very large group of people in large cities to cause riots by inciting racism and hate? Does this happen in the country?

NOTE: Reviewing a map of the United States .vs. Voting .vs. Sanctuary Cities .vs. Crime, what do you find? How do you feel about this?

with crime overlayed

10) Did this happen before? i.e. LA riots? Ferguson?

11) Is it possible that by getting multiple groups to fight with each other, or even create the perception of a fight you can shift the attention to them, instead of onto the real problem?

12) Who benefits?

13) Does this country need all citizens to live together? Even with different ideas about how to make things work?

14) How do you discuss without getting violent?
(Kid President Is Over It!)

15) For those people who are racist and bigots, what do we do with them? Should we lock them up? Should we kill them? Should be re-educate them? Who decides?

Idea of White Privilege, racism, cops killing people, violence?
Listen to Larry Elder
(Larry Elder Destroys The Myth of White Privilege, Racism, and Police Brutality)

Here is a gentleman that goes off on Shia's webcam about 1984 .vs. 1776
(Black Trump Supporter Redpills "He Will Not Divide Us" Stream)

(so look, if these guys can't agree there is a larger problem, the media?)
(Larry Elder & Marc Lamont)

NOTE: Should we think about other countries occupying our country? How about a counter-revolution?
(Larry Grathwohl interview about William Ayers,Obama's Mentor)

Longer version interview with Larry:
(Bringing Down America by Larry Grathwohl)

16) What has Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr. and Obama (with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State) done for us as a country, for the people, over the last 28 years?

17) Could we do better?

18) What would that look like? How can things change if we keep electing the same establishment players? Could electing someone totally different than the standard track of politicians actually make a difference?

If you read into the Brexit and a group called the UK IP (UK Independent Party), you find a guy named Nigel Farage at the center.

He made a movement stick, much like that of what Ron Paul started in the 1970's. Donald Trump was very similar the these values, but was always on the Democratic side of things. When Trump found the Republican party had forsaken the foundations of the US Constitution he decided to overthrow the party from within using good old fashion tactics. Why the DNC decided to run Clinton against him I will never know, because it was suicide. If they would have fully supported Bernie Sanders I believe he would have been elected this cycle, just that the Globalists wouldn't be able to control Bernie so well.

George Soros has funded and overthrown national government before, using the color revolution tactics, and he can do it again.

Out of all this, I don't believe we can really do anything on the large scale, but we can certainly start locally at Golden Hills showing kids there is another side to the conflict. Showing them how life really works, so that God can take over and work in their lives. I truly believe that during revolutionary times we need to think about military tactics to win kids over the God. We have to go find out what drives them find out how best to reach their minds. Only through their minds, can we overcome their animal nature, or the "Reptilian" brain.

Here is a portion:

And an online book, available on Amazon as well gives you an unbelievable overview of history

With Bill Gates at the center of many new movements forward now

EU Superstate, after you create a problem, then swoop in to deliver the answer to everyones fears

These lay out quite a bit of this is a long expose, down the rabbit hole, but if you print this out, it will be worthwhile

Some things to ponder and have answers for on current trends in pop recording RAP music and culture.

What if Rap Music could be used to turn a nation of kids into Thugs?

Ricky Ross and the Drug Fetish Thug Culture

Media Bias?
Blacks have allowed themselves to be defined by the press, activists, politicians and the entertainment media, who have set themselves up as the final arbiters of racial orthodoxy in America. That definition is one that had its genesis in nothing less than the quintessential stereotype of good-old-time bigots. This stereotype portrays blacks as shiftless, ignorant, nefarious, manifestly incapable of holding on to money and wholly preoccupied with sex.

This, if one examines the so-called culture that is so vociferously defended by many blacks, is most definitively encapsulated in “thug culture,” which has been legitimized in media and which received a shot in the arm in the aftermath of the Trayvon Martin shooting. Indeed, blacks – particularly young blacks – were even more so encouraged to embrace and flaunt the thug image, if for no other reason than to protest the shooting.

Thug Culture is a Cancer

Saturday, November 12, 2016

Best Documentaries to watch

This is the best 3 1/2 hours to spend learning an in-depth look at our economy, banking and political power. I Will followup with several more great documentaries.

The Money Masters - Full Documentary (1996)

The Secret Government: Bill Moyers (1987)

Invisible Empire (Full Documentary)

The Power Of Nightmares: Part 1 Baby Its Cold Outside (2004)

The Century of the Self (Full Documentary)

(Official Movie) THRIVE: What On Earth Will It Take?

War Corporatism - What Barry Says

Edwin Black Discusses IBM and the Holocaust

One Mainframe To Rule Them All [FULL]


WE - Arundhati Roy 1/7

Feature Film - The Stanford Prison Experiment

The Milgram Experiment 1962 Full Documentary

The psychology of evil | Philip Zimbardo

ANCIENT CIVILIZATIONS : Ancient Persia and Arabian Peninsula