Rep. Ron Paul breaks it down for Ben "Helicopter" Bernake on the Federal Reserve and how it harms Americans financially and enriches the banking elite.
I am glad everyone likes the clip. I was scanning through my episodes on C-SPAN and found this gem the other day. I am so glad I tape these hearings on Tivo, they really pay off from time to time. I did post a much longer segment which includes Barney Frank's comments, Ron Paul of course, and several other committee members, before Bernanke speaks. However, Google Video decided that C-SPAN was copyrighted and whacked my upload. I am contacting C-SPAN for clarification on copyright for speeches from the floor.
I think that programs like Washington Journal, etc should be copy protected, but House and Senate hearings/speeches?
---
I got this up on concen as a torrent
http://conspiracycentral.net:6969/.../
ronpaul_finance_subcommittee_2-17-2007-FULL_xvid.rar
This is Ron Paul from the House Finance Committee Floor.
b4395f9d456ca482ae112d855bca24ade27310ac
read more | digg story
General information as I see it [sean@resisttyranny.com]. "If you can be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you can be told what to say or think. Defend your constitutionally protected rights, no one else will do it for you". The change that we must embrace is not a simple change of political structure or economic policy, but rather a complete [r]evolution of consciousness and awareness within the human mind. http://resisttyranny.com
Friday, February 23, 2007
Cheney:‘No Consensus That Global Warming Is ‘Caused By Man’
In its latest report, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded it was “very likely” — or more than 90 percent probable — that human activities led by burning fossil fuels explained most of the warming in the past 50 years.
Global Warming is more of a Global Climate change. Most of it is brought about by natural world activities like volcanos, and of course the Sun heating up. To state that fossil fuels are solely responsible, is just a course of action leading to a world-wide carbon tax or something.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../
read more | digg story
Global Warming is more of a Global Climate change. Most of it is brought about by natural world activities like volcanos, and of course the Sun heating up. To state that fossil fuels are solely responsible, is just a course of action leading to a world-wide carbon tax or something.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../
read more | digg story
$1,000,000 if you can show Ed Brown the law
Ed Brown is offering a $1,000,000 compensation (commercial property) to the first person to show him the law requiring him to pay federal income tax.
@fourletters in the research I have done, Congress can tax us on income derived from any source. However, income is defined as gains and profits ONLY. http://www.taxhistory.com/1909.html
Ed is right, there is no law. I am glad someone with balls of steel, and the money to back it is coming forward.
"Article XVI. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States and without regard to any census or enumeration."
This is the Sixteenth Amendment; but notice that it makes no provision for the repeal of the clauses requiring apportionment. Why? Because it was not the "intent" of Congress to levy a direct tax (or a "capitation" tax for that matter), the "intent" was to clarify that a tax laid upon the "income", derived from real and personal property, was in its nature an excise tax. In other words, Congress specifically intended that the "gains and profits" derived from the "income" of real and personal property be treated in the same manner as the "gains and profits" derived from business and professional pursuits. In other words, the Sixteenth Amendment is a "net-income" tax, not a gross income tax.
---
Top link in this article is http://tree3.com/861/ please watch it all the way through. Order the DVD/cd's and pass them around. This study course goes in depth on "sources" and "derived income" the law, title 26, and regulations thereof. Once you watch this presentation, you will all understand.
read more | digg story
@fourletters in the research I have done, Congress can tax us on income derived from any source. However, income is defined as gains and profits ONLY. http://www.taxhistory.com/1909.html
Ed is right, there is no law. I am glad someone with balls of steel, and the money to back it is coming forward.
"Article XVI. The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States and without regard to any census or enumeration."
This is the Sixteenth Amendment; but notice that it makes no provision for the repeal of the clauses requiring apportionment. Why? Because it was not the "intent" of Congress to levy a direct tax (or a "capitation" tax for that matter), the "intent" was to clarify that a tax laid upon the "income", derived from real and personal property, was in its nature an excise tax. In other words, Congress specifically intended that the "gains and profits" derived from the "income" of real and personal property be treated in the same manner as the "gains and profits" derived from business and professional pursuits. In other words, the Sixteenth Amendment is a "net-income" tax, not a gross income tax.
---
Top link in this article is http://tree3.com/861/ please watch it all the way through. Order the DVD/cd's and pass them around. This study course goes in depth on "sources" and "derived income" the law, title 26, and regulations thereof. Once you watch this presentation, you will all understand.
read more | digg story
Saturday, February 10, 2007
You may never have to pay income tax again--if Ed Brown can get to court
"The continuing story of Ed Brown, the New Hampshire man who asserts Americans don't have to pay income tax and can use the tax code to prove it. With enough support, Ed may get his day in court--and that's precisely what scares the IRS. Digg this up, make some noise, and let's see what one stubborn person can do!!"
Police enforcement is handled by the city you are in, not the Federal government. The Constitution allows for a tax on incomes derived. If you look at the actual tax code it means income and profit from a business. So yes, if you have a business you must pay taxes on profit and income (gains and profits). However, on actual labor there is no law stating you must pay an income tax, in fact taxes are supposed to be on gains and profits only. http://www.taxhistory.com/1909.html
We have been paying taxes for so long, I don't think most people really understand what it is all about. It basically has given the big banking cartel called the Federal Reserve (yes they are private banks) enough money to do us in. The United States no longer uses Income taxes to pay for any services, it simply pays off our national debt (basically interest on it). If we stopped paying income tax we would have to absolve all debt back to the Federal Reserve and shut it down. Yes, there would be some pandemonium for a while, but we would get over it.
We need to get rid of the central banking cartel of which the Federal Reserve banks belong, the IMF and the WTO. They are just causing pain and suffering throughout the world in the form of tax credits, trade credits, and fake loans.
Wake up and watch Freedom to Fascism. It doesn't answer all questions, but it makes you think and do research for yourself. Keep in mind that the Federal government can tax you on gains and profits for ANY source derived. Direct labor is NOT taxable, only gains and profits from things like property, gifts, business profit, investments, etc. So, yes, you perhaps need to file a tax form with the federal government if you have income stated as the above. You DO NOT have to file a 1040 if all you do is labor for your money. Also keep in mind that state and local taxes are still applicable.
read more | digg story
Police enforcement is handled by the city you are in, not the Federal government. The Constitution allows for a tax on incomes derived. If you look at the actual tax code it means income and profit from a business. So yes, if you have a business you must pay taxes on profit and income (gains and profits). However, on actual labor there is no law stating you must pay an income tax, in fact taxes are supposed to be on gains and profits only. http://www.taxhistory.com/1909.html
We have been paying taxes for so long, I don't think most people really understand what it is all about. It basically has given the big banking cartel called the Federal Reserve (yes they are private banks) enough money to do us in. The United States no longer uses Income taxes to pay for any services, it simply pays off our national debt (basically interest on it). If we stopped paying income tax we would have to absolve all debt back to the Federal Reserve and shut it down. Yes, there would be some pandemonium for a while, but we would get over it.
We need to get rid of the central banking cartel of which the Federal Reserve banks belong, the IMF and the WTO. They are just causing pain and suffering throughout the world in the form of tax credits, trade credits, and fake loans.
Wake up and watch Freedom to Fascism. It doesn't answer all questions, but it makes you think and do research for yourself. Keep in mind that the Federal government can tax you on gains and profits for ANY source derived. Direct labor is NOT taxable, only gains and profits from things like property, gifts, business profit, investments, etc. So, yes, you perhaps need to file a tax form with the federal government if you have income stated as the above. You DO NOT have to file a 1040 if all you do is labor for your money. Also keep in mind that state and local taxes are still applicable.
read more | digg story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)