Thursday, December 03, 2009

Predictions for 2010 - 2012

Dear Friends,

I want to share with you some predictions that I have for the next three years. I am not claiming that any of this is “thus saith the Lord”, but I submit this to you for your careful reflection and analysis. The writing is already on the wall as far as the beginnings of many of these things. This is more of an observation of current events and extension of them to their logical conclusions. There is nothing new under the sun and the law of sowing and reaping has not been repealed. -- John L Wadsworth

BUSINESS CLOSURES Just as last year was characterized by home foreclosures, and one could drive through neighborhoods and see many abandoned and foreclosed homes, dying lawns, and “for sale” signs, 2010 will see the same sort of phenomena appearing in the commercial sector. By driving around you will begin to notice more and more vacant and boarded up stores, closed small businesses, signs for vacancy in strip malls, empty buildings, etc.

GRASSROOTS PROTESTS Grassroots protests will occur, but will be marginalized by the mainstream media.

UNEMPLOYMENT WILL SOAR Small business and private sector jobs will suffer. Reduced hours and unemployment will soar. False, misleading, and irrelevant economic statistics will be released by the White House and the mainstream media in an effort to do damage control.

INFLATION will begin to manifest, continually rising throughout the next few years. Those with salaries anchored to the consumer price index will not receive raises fast enough to stay afloat financially.

EMPTY SHELVES WILL BEGIN TO APPEAR More empty shelves will appear in stores. Rather than there being more goods on the shelves due to a lack of buyers, there will be less good available, and it will begin to show in the shelf and aisle space in stores. This is the predictable result of central planning, Keynesian economics, Marxism, socialism, and the “takeover/bailout” philosophy. Those who have immigrated here from other countries will recognize this phenomenon as the fruit of corrupt government that has interfered in the private sector. Constitutionalists will recognize it as the fruit of the government breaking the compact that exists between “we the people” and the government. There will still be those, who with full support of the mainstream media will say the crisis is occurring because the government still does not have enough power and influence in the economy and that the government needs yet more control and more government programs are needed to rectify the crisis.

UNION GREED The last sector to be hit will be government jobs, the jobs of “first responders”, fire departments, cop shops, etc. Government employees will begin to be furloughed or get reduced hours and benefits, but rather than accepting this as their private sector non-union counterparts have already, they will strike and protest, considering themselves to be more important than private sector workers who have already tightened their belts. Greedy government workers’ unions will begin competing for the last remaining slices of the dwindling economic pie.

SCROUNGING FOR FOOD AND FORAGING People will be seen actually scrounging for food and foraging in and around urban centers. Homelessness will predictably increase, and manifest where it has not been present before.

RESENTMENT OF PAYING TAXES THAT ARE WASTED BY GOVERNMENT As inflation rises, the grassroots tax protest movement will become more and more mainstream. The people will realize that the only thing in the economy that can be characterized as “Astroturf” is the artificial economics compelled upon us by the government.

BLACK MARKET ECONOMICS The underground economy will become widespread, with what, in essence is a black market will develop for labor, goods, and services. There will be the “black market” price or rate, and the government price or rate. This condition is the same as that which occurred before the breakup of the Soviet Union and all its satellite countries.

WELFARE DEPENDENCE WILL INCREASE As unemployment rises and inflation reduces the purchasing power of those who still have jobs, more and more people will seek access to “government services” such as welfare and unemployment, many, while working in the black market, double-dipping just to make ends meet.

DISTRUST OF GOVERNMENT WILL INCREASE Public disapproval with the President and the Congress, and all politicians will reach an historic high.

CIVIL UNREST Civil unrest will manifest on a scale not yet seen in U.S. history.

TERROR ATTACKS Terror attacks will be carried out, but the government will take steps to deceive the citizenry and tell the people that everything is ok. Rather than taking common sense approaches to law enforcement, political correctness will impede our national security. The government will sell America on the idea that trading yet more individual liberty for “safety” is what we must do as American citizens, and that as a nation, we must give up our sovereignty and super-power status in order to be more safe in a “changing world”.

THE DOLLAR WILL FAIL AND THE U.S. WILL LOSE MORE OF ITS SOVEREIGNTY The U.S. dollar will fail as the world’s foremost “hard” currency. The White House will subjugate us to the U.N. in violation of our Constitution. The U.N. will insist on reforms concerning the American dollar, and will require either a new currency, or an official exchange rate, which they control. Alternative forms of currency and barter will begin to be used by many in various regions. This will only deepen the recession here in America, while the rest of the world has a small economic recovery before a larger financial implosion. An official exchange rate will provoke yet more black market activities.

INCREASE IN TAXES AT ALL LEVELS WILL RESULT IN LOWER REVENUES TO GOVERNMENT, with many self-employed and small business owners keeping two sets of books, one official, and the other one “black market” as they refuse to go along willfully with the plundering of their lives so that politicians can redistribute the hard-earned fruit of their labor. Many will adopt the practice of reporting lower earnings so that they actually qualify for government paybacks exceeding the amount they have paid in during the fiscal year (e.g. “Earned Income Tax Credit”).

WELFARE BENEFITS WILL INCREASE BUT WILL ONLY ACCELERATE AND DEEPEN THE DEPRESSION The government will continue to increase benefits to unemployed and the poor in an effort to secure votes and popularity. All this will be done at the expense of those still working, trying to survive through the fruits of their labor.

UNCONSTITUTIONAL TREATIES Treaties will be made which weaken the U.S. These treaties will be made by the White House, in full violation of the U.S. Constitution, which requires that Congress make treaties, not a man who has claimed extraordinary powers.

OUR SUPREMACY ON THE HIGH SEAS WILL BE CHALLENGED Our enemies will probe, weaken us, and out-develop us in reference to our Naval abilities.

THE OUTSKIRTS OF THE EMPIRE WILL CRUMBLE WHILE PROBLEMS MANIFEST AT HOME Many areas, we could characterize as the “outskirts” of the empire will no longer be fully supported by home.

SCAPEGOATING WILL OCCUR BY THE WHITE HOUSE AND THE DHS In a last gasping effort at retaining control of the power that was seized from the people, the White House will begin a movement to “scapegoat” a class or classes of people whom they will blame for the failure of their leftist and statist policies.

THERE WILL BE A CHRISTIAN REVIVAL Many will wonder if there is a God, and where He is, and will look for Him. Those in the church who have supported policies that are contrary to God’s word will either have to repent, or become irrelevant, as the seekers look for answers. The false premise that faith and politics or that faith and economics, or that faith and social policy don’t mix will be radically shaken. There will be a movement of principled lovers of liberty who understand how nations rise and fall in accordance with the promises of God’s word, and the people’s obedience or violation of His law and principles.

A REVITALIZED CONSTITUTIONAL MOVEMENT WILL EMERGE as people rediscover the simple meaning of the words contained in the Constitution and the limitations it places on Federal government and the many violations that have been made of this compact between “we the people” and the government. A clash will occur between those who yet still advocate for more government involvement in the lives of its subjects, and those who advocate for less government interference in the lives of its citizens.


Monday, November 30, 2009

news of the year

Don’t look to the mainstream media for the most critical coverage of the news of the year.

After all , is Tiger Woods or Obama’s Nobel prize really what characterized the year? Will the mainstream media even mention the tea party movement? Or will they trumpet far less meaningful events?

Friday, November 20, 2009

The new face of the TEA party movement

by Jill Price

Here is very good information I have pulled from a few articles from TEA Party discussions- Great info! I know it is a lot to digest, but if you want truth, you will have to be ready to do homework and get educated. We are headed for a one world government and Obama is falling right in line, just as he was prepared to do. There are deeper meanings to the health care bill, cap and trade, swine flu "pandemic" and on and on. All of this to create chaos and fear, more government control, dumbing down America, control over public education, on and on. Read 1984, Animal Farm- it is a take over and it is the people behind Obama- the UN is serious business and we need to stop being "overwhelmed with too much information". Have they already dumbed us down America??? Read history and understand today. Do you know what the Trilateralist Commission and Council on Foreign Relations are? Do you know who the Builderberg Group is? Here is the definition from Wikipedia: The Bilderberg Group, Bilderberg conference, or Bilderberg Club is an unofficial, annual, invitation-only conference of around 130 guests, most of whom are persons of great influence in the fields of politics, business, banking, and media. And by the way, this year, Obama and Hillary Clinton were invited, and this is where policy is written for the world. WAKE UP and get over your fears of deep issues. FOX News doesn't tell all! There is research you will have to do without it being spoon fed to you. We have been spoiled for way too long. Let's get to the bottom of the truth and get it out.

From Faith in the "Right Movement"


The earliest origin of the Council on Foreign Relations stemmed from a working fellowship of about 150 scholars, called "The Inquiry," tasked to brief President Woodrow Wilson about options for the postwar world when Germany was defeated around 1917. Wilson, as an aside, was the President who signed the Federal Reserve Act into law. CFR was officially formed in 1921 and is a non-profit, non-partisan American “think tank.” All the regular players are there, including the Rockefeller's and other major players of the day in banking, politics, etc.…follow the money. Some of the members of CFR are legit. My belief is that those people who started out in CFR and then either founded or joined one or more of the four (4) are the ones that are really behind the major stuff.


In 1954, the Bilderberg Group was founded by none other than David Rockefeller. Membership is by invitation only and you have to be sick rich to belong to Bilderberg. The group meets annually at hotels or resorts throughout the world—for two consecutive years in Europe followed by a year in the United States or Canada. This tradition was broken in 2008 when the meeting was held in Chantilly, VA, to give easier access to those associated with the U.S. elections. Both Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama attended that meeting. Further, my guess is that, like the mafia, once you are brought in on the “inside” of Bilderberg’s agenda…you never leave. Only way out of Bilderberg is death…either by natural or unnatural causes.


The Club of Rome, and international “think tank” was founded in 1968. David Rockefeller and Gorbachev are members. It really shook the Bushes in 1972 with its report The Limits to Growth. According to the club's publications, the common enemy of humanity is man, so democracy may not be well suited to the tasks ahead. However, the threat of pollution, global warming, water shortages, and famine can be used to fulfill humanity's need for a common adversary. The oil “crisis” of 1973 brought this publication more merit than it ever should have received, and so they slammed out another publication, Mankind at the Turning Point in 1974. The Second Report revised the predictions of the original Limits to Growth and gave a more “optimistic” prognosis for the future of the environment, noting that many of the factors were within human control and therefore that environmental and economic catastrophe were preventable or avoidable…enter Al “the planet has a fever” Gore and the platform for the Greens.


Then came Trilateral in 1973. Trilateral is also a private organization. And guess who founded Trilateral? You guessed it…David Rockefeller, who was Chairman of CFR at the time. Trilateral took CFR to a whole other level. Trilateral was established supposedly to foster closer cooperation among the United States, Europe and Japan but, in my view, Rockefeller had much more sinister intentions. Membership in Trilateral is by invitation only, but there is no monetary threshold to becoming a member. Every single President and/or Vice President of the United States since JFK has been a member. There are also corporate members which is different from any of the other organizations. All areas of the economy are represented…those that they need anyway. Banking (every major US and foreign bank), housing (Fannie and Freddie), and media (NY Times, Wall Street Journal, etc.) are heavily represented in terms of membership.

"I would like to add just a little information to what Faith has said regarding the Trilateral Commission previously. In founding the Trilateral Commission it appears that Zbigniew Brzezinski and David Rockefeller worked together to found it. Current members include:

US Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner
Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice
National Security Advisor Thomas Donilon
Chairman, Economic Recovery Committee, Paul Volcker
Director of National Intelligence Admiral Dennis C. Blair
Asst, Secretary of State, Asia and Pacific, Kurt M. Campbell
Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg
State Dept. Special Envoy Richard Haas
State Dept. Special Envoy Dennis Ross
State Dept. Special Envoy Richard Holbrooke

In addition to those links and the Obama administration:

Hillary is married to commission member Bill Clinton

Geithner worked with former Nixon secretary of state Henry Kissenger who is a lifetime trustee.

Brent Scowcroft has been an unofficial advisor to Obama and is a member.

Robert Zoellick who is currently president of the World Bank

Lawrence Summers, White House economic advisor was mentored during the Clinton administration by commission member Robert Rubin who was Treasury Secretary during the Clinton administration.

They are certainly present in the administration. These are globalists as are a number of senators and congressmen in the house. Their tentacles run deep."

"Because they work with the UN, they are able to get traction on their plans, which by any conservative account are despicable. The ultimate goal is to control the world politically, economically and religiously—one world everything."

...Second, excellent post on "Story #8: UN Grand Poobah Moon Wants World Government." The UN, the Trilateralist Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations (which works hand in hand with the Trilateralists and the UN) and other secret but powerful groups provide us with legitimate concern and the suggestion of One World inevitability. Run by men who were members of secret societies at various colleges, usually Ivy League (such as Yale's Skull and Bones) the membership of which includes both George H. W. Bush, the Trilateralists have been pushing for a New World Order for decades.

It is by the Trialeralists and the other groups and the UN that the concept of the United States of Europe was given birth and why the Euro was made the currency in most of Europe. The triumverate strategy is to start with Europe and work their way eastward into Asia, principally China, and then India in the Sub-Continent, and then into Third World countries. They're saving the easiest to convert until last.

Because they work with the UN, they are able to get traction on their plans, which by any conservative account are despicable. The ultimate goal is to control the world politically, economically and religiously—one world everything.

Pat Robertson of CBN has been particularly vocal about the New World Order and how it is patently anti-biblical. Other influential voices have been added to his. If you have carefully read "Revelation" or the Left Behind series, and believe in the Antichrist, you know that he must be able to control the entire world. From each country he will strip sovereignty and of all weapons arsenals under the guise of "keeping the peace." His real motivation vis-a-vis the use of those weapons is first to keep all nations in line, and second for use in the Battle of Armageddon. In "Revelation," John writes about "a sea of glass" in the Middle East which can be achieved only by the heat of an atomic blast melting the sand into that sea of glass.

The UN, an agency that relies mostly on the United States and the permanent members of the Security Council for its financial support is extremely anti-U.S., and as you point out, anti-everything in which we believe and hold dear.

But their plans have begun to fray around the edges with the concept of a United States of Europe, which is largely due to the shrinking support of skeptical new leaders, most notably French President Nicholas Sarkozy, Italian President Silvio Berlusconi and German President Angela Merkel (each of whom is slowly distancing him and herself from the unity policies of their predecessors), as well as the proletariat in each country which clings to heritages both ancient and sacrosanct. They don't want what makes them unique hurled into the "melting pot" of a USE.

The British are perhaps the most notable for the resistance. Their rejection of the euro being the most obvious sign of dubiousness and a lack of trust in a USE.

In short, the UN, Trilateralists and the other groups miscalculated the lay of the geopolitical landscape, have adjusted their strategies long term and are hard at work trying to rebuild bridges. I know this because, as an investigative journalist, I have been fed information since the 1980s by a member of one of the secret groups and by a member of the Council of Foreign Relations.

That a New World Order (synonymous and interchangeable with the One World government, economy and religion) is a subject about which religious organizations have been concerned for decades. The Book of "Revelation" gives us a very clear guide of what is to happen. The antichrist cannot rise to power until a natural or unnatural global catastrophe occurs, at which time he will have solutions that will escape the minds of all world leaders and make him appear messianic in the minds of disparate populations. National leaders will eagerly cede national soverignty and their weapons arsenals to him.

Because the UN's membership represents the vast majority of nations, so it is the ideal political body from which to launch the quest for global domination.

That said, there are similarities between the Copenhagen Conference and the Kyoto Accord, the latter of which has failed to meet its mandate primarily for lack of US support. President George W. Bush rejected Kyoto, and with Obama deciding not to attend the Copenhagen Conference, he seems to have rejected the tenets of that treaty, although I am uncertain as to whether or not he can sign it post-conference.

But what's critical here is the growing chorus of dissent from climatologists who are backing away from the whole concept of global warming and embracing a natural global atmospheric shift. Holes have successfully been punched through "An Inconvenient Truth," Al Gore's the-sky-is-turning-into-CO2" movie that is coming increasingly under substantial skepticism. Meteorologists at Accuweather, in particular, point out that the summer just passed was the third coolest on record, and the last three years have been colder than normal. Gore's critics outright state that golbal warming caused by man is a myth.

My sense is that Copenhagen will suffer a fate similar to that of Kyoto. Without active participation by the US, it cannot succeed, and if it is signed by President Obama, there's an extremely small chance that the Senate, as left as much of it is on the political spectrum, will not ratify the Copenhagen treaty for the very constitutional reasons you cite.

Hopefully, other voices of warning within the political wilderness will be added to yours to make as many as possible aware of the very real dangers ahead. "

To view the group wire:

To view the group home:

To view James Hyde's profile page:

Thursday, November 05, 2009

Obama’s New Bill of Rights

If you haven't seen the latest travesty this administration has put forward, take a look at the website, under "The Constitution" and how it dumbs down the wording so we can "understand" it. I know its so difficult for us serfs trying to grasp the words of our great leaders.

Obama can kiss my butt, because this is a total travesty of conscience. It is a total slap in the face, considering Obama himself is supposed to be a lawyer. What exactly was he doing, defending pets from their owners?

If you didn't catch the second amendment as it was written and adopted:

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

If you didn't catch what the whitehouse claims on their website, and I will put this as a graphic to eliminate all possible editing or confusion:

and if that isn't enough, then just read through the explanation of why the constitution was needed in the first place. From my perspective you just need to look at the Declaration of Independence. It explains that governments are corrupt and they need to be tied down, so they created some rules to limit the governments power. If we allow the Obama administration to re-write our constitution by updating a website blog, we are all in need of a butt whooping. I wonder just exactly how old that staffer was who interpreted it this way. It still had to get approved, right?

Get out there and cause a commotion, get them to change this. Read the following article, and make some calls. Turn off the TV and get your neighbors to do the same.

Obama’s New Bill of Rights [link article]

Dudley Brown
November 4, 2009

Make no mistake: Our Founders were onto something when they enshrined the right to keep and bear arms as the Second Amendment to our nation’s founding document, the United States Constitution.

Because the Second Amendment is part of our nation’s supreme law, attacking gun rights means attacking the very foundation of the country.

The gun grabbers know they have to deal with this supreme law at some point if they’re going to push their radical agenda through.

And so they’ve decided to rewrite the Bill of Rights to best suit their plans.

That’s right. In an attempt to circumvent our nation’s fundamental law, Barack Obama has rewritten his own version of the Bill of Rights and posted it on the White House website.

According to Obama, “The Second Amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms.”

I don’t know about you, but my right to defend myself comes from my Creator — not from government, not from some bureaucrat or politician, but from my very nature as a human being.I’m sure I don’t have to tell you that redefining a fundamental right as a privilege is a very dangerous path to start down.

A right is inherent in our humanity and can never be taken away.

A privilege can be removed at the whim of one’s rulers.

But the President’s redefinition of our nation’s fundamental law isn’t enough for some anti-freedom zealots.

Gun grabbers in our government-run education system are now seeking to brainwash your children into accepting their anti-gun agenda — also by rewriting the Bill of Rights.

Lesson plans in Garland, Texas, (Texas?! Really?!) now teach the Second Amendment by summarizing as follows, “Amendment 2: We can get permission to own weapons to protect ourselves.”

This couldn’t be any further from what the Second Amendment clearly states!

“The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

I want you to call the White House and the Garland Independent School District and demand they restore the original language to the Second Amendment.

The White House Comment Line: 202-456-1111

GISD Superintendent Curtis Culwell: 972-487–3023

Tell them you will not stand for revisionist history or the weakening of our nation’s fundamental law. The Founding Fathers wrote it that way for a reason!

In Liberty,

Dudley Brown
Executive Director
National Association for Gun Rights

Another reason why the Government should NOT run our schools
[original article]

Thursday, October 29, 2009

Up Yours Ban Ki-Moon

This is in response to your "We Can Do It" article in the "news" paper New York Times.

I will not sit idly back anymore and listen to you, a man living over 5000 miles away, tell me, my city and my country how to live. Come on, I don't even agree with how President Obama is running the country. How on earth, literally, can we be expected to all agree to this treaty in Copenhagen? How can we divert our sovereignty over to a bunch of power greedy men such as yourself? Well, ok, perhaps you are just a puppet for all the international offshore bankers, but still you have some pull.

Its difficult enough to get some point across at my local city, let along my county seat of government. Then I try working with my state government of California, take for instance the DMV, and holy cow, they really make things difficult. In trying to talk with my particular federal representative, they are for the most part just downright nasty and some of them wont event talk to us. Senators are elevated to almost godhood, and they complain about "security" every time a constituent actually has a complaint, god-forbid we might actually have something to say about the way they represent us. So you're telling me, that by putting a global governance in place, we the people will actually have some say about what is going on? I hardly think so.

The U.N. was created in the United States by self-proclaimed internationalists like the Rockefellers. I don't see the relevance of your organization, nor do I believe the world is any better for it being around. I am pretty sure the world was doing pretty good before the U.N. was founded in 1945. Holy Toledo, you mean America actually did all its really great industrial building, traded with world partners and became an unbelievable country before the U.N.? That is certainly amazing to me. America became the greatest nation on the planet, traded with tons of countries, was worldwide known for its generosity, was feared, and its citizens were actually respected.

Along came a bunch of greedy men under the disguise of international bankers and really screwed the whole system. Our Federal Reserve central bank, nothing more than a criminal cartel [1] of these same bankers was formed in 1913. We have been at war, in some kind of depression or recession, and the world has been at each others throats ever since. I mean just look at history, open your eyes, am I wrong? Sure there have been problems out there, but things really started going down hill when we adopted a central bank over here. Do you think that could be the cause of the problems in the rest of the world [1] [2] [3]? Perhaps other countries have had the same problem too, it would be something to look into. Put some of your top men on it, and I bet you find yourself the answer.

The new administration of the United States under Barack Obama has handed out more money and power [1] [2] [3] to Wall Street, international bankers/traders, insurance companies, and commercial banks than any other administration combined [1] [2]. We see Al Gore continuously following this agenda of the "world is going to end" if we don't tax our carbon output. Hello, but if we really did have a big problem with carbon emissions, then perhaps we should cut them back, drill for oil over here in North America, find better technology for solar and geothermal power. How is taking my money away from me and sending it overseas going to help?

What we don't want is to take our money and start sending it over to third world countries, expecting this is going to solve anything [1]. What on earth is a beet farmer in Venezuela going to do with my money? Is it going to stop global climate change? Wow, and I thought that perhaps the Sun had something to do with the Earth warming up. Heh Al Gore, did you know the sunspot activity on the Sun has been basically on the decline? Did you realize the temperatures in the solar system are dropping [1] [2]? Or are you simply too stupid to pick up a paper or read technical journals? Ban, you may want to re-evaluate your idea that Al Gore is intelligent and start listening to scientists and not politicians at the IPCC [1] [2].

I agree that climate change is a problem; I agree that when it gets too hot I start sweating; I agree that when it gets too cold my wife wants to rub her really cold feet on me. Does that mean we have to create carbon trading businesses, use the force of government for compliance, and once again regulate a bunch of business that doesn't need it?

If you haven't heard of what Carbon Dioxide is, let me educate you on a few facts. Plants breath it. Wow, you're saying to yourself, "I didn't realize plants use a toxic gas that is killing the planet". What about oxygen? We breath it, but it kills plants, thats really strange. You probably wonder how on earth we are still living, despite the fact that every living creature on this planet who breathes air, exhales Carbon Dioxide. There is good news. Plants breathe in Carbon Dioxide. They use it, along with the Sun (by the way that is the big yellow ball of gas in the sky that creates heat and light) to create a process called photosynthesis, which is a big boy word for food. Plants take this food, process it, and become bigger and stay alive. Now, the most amazing process about that is the fact they actually exhale or give off Oxygen. Wow, once again you're saying to yourself "how on earth can plants take in a poison gas that is killing the earth" and actually keep on living, and amazingly they create oxygen from sunlight.

I know, I was stunned myself, when I learned about this in 1st grade. I am not sure what your schools in Korea teach, but over here in America, even with the national education system the way it is, we teach our kids about plants and such. So to wrap up that little educational session, Oxygen-->Good, Carbon Dioxide-->Good. We breath oxygen from plants, we exhale Carbon Dioxide, plants take that gas along with the big yellow sun, and create oxygen to complete the cycle. Oh yeah, and the "greenhouse gases" thing needs to be looked at again too, because your numbers simply don't match with reality.

I even heard from my son, who is in 2nd grade, that the plant population actually grows when it gets warmer, go figure. Sea life population seems to grow too when the plants in the sea grow, who would have figured? Basically, listen to the scientists over at the OISM (Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine).

There are no experimental data to support the hypothesis that increases in human hydrocarbon use or in atmospheric carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are causing or can be expected to cause unfavorable changes in global temperatures, weather, or landscape. There is no reason to limit human production of CO2, CH4, and other minor greenhouse gases as has been proposed (82,83,97,123).

Unfortunately, all these years of your buddy Al Gore preaching these "climate sciences" he keeps using a chart [1] talking about how Carbon Dioxide emissions create the warming trend. The interesting thing about this, is the charts are never put together so you can see the peaks and valleys together in the same chart. If his presentation would include a neat side-by-side comparison of warming and C02 emissions you would find that C02 follows warming cycles. Amazingly this is because the warmer it gets, carbon dioxide levels seem to increase, causing even greater warming. Human activity isn't causing this, its caused from the Sun and radiant heat from the solar system, and yes, extra C02 also warms things up more [1] [2] [3] [4] [5].

Should we pollute the atmosphere? No. Should we recycle? Yes. Does it make sense to keep businesses from polluting? Yes. Should we reduce smog, and increase air quality? Yes. Lets start by getting rid of diesel buses and forcing ourselves to use electric and/or hybrid buses. I hear they don't have to pollute the air and they are quieter. Have you ever been behind a bus? It really smells bad, and I can't stop from coughing and choking. Can you imagine what airplanes and war ships produce? Coal produces 54% of our power and is pretty dirty too [1]. Perhaps nuclear power can work wonders for us. I heard something about wind power, and power generated from water too. Is that even possible? I mean I see all these damns holding back water, perhaps they can be useful for creating power too. Those windmills look really pretty when I drive by them but I wonder since they are spinning anyway perhaps power can be generated from them too. The Sun is pretty bright, I can barely look at it, can we use solar power too? The options seem endless.

What we don't need to do is create yet even more government to regulate and control these things. We need our existing government, a smaller government, to gets off its collective self, and use existing law to protect its citizens. Over here in America we have this old document called the Constitution, and it (and our declaration) talks about how a limited government is here to protect the rights of man. It talks about how government is the problem, and it needs to be controlled. It talks about if a government gets too big and full of itself we are supposed to shut it down, and rebuild it. What does Korea have to say about this? I am pretty sure that its my right to live and breathe air, so perhaps the government can do its job and get rid of diesel engine pollution. Oh yeah, that would really screw up the oil industry, sorry, I forgot about that. The oil industry is one of those things thats "too big too fail" over here, so we all have to stop eating as much and pay more taxes to make sure our buddies over at BP and Shell make their profits for the quarter.

Ban, you talk about needing an "equitable and ambitious deal in Copenhagen". Can you define equitable? How about ambitious? I mean could ambitious mean to enslave those people who don't agree with you? Should we go to someones house and taser them if they don't comply? Perhaps fining them $1000 a day so they basically become homeless and can't eat anymore? Would that be good enough for you? Could it mean to tax citizens of 1st world nations at 75% levels so developing nations get the benefit? Wait, you talk again of "can we help to protect the most vulnerable nations from the effects of climate change". What nations are more vulnerable to climate change, you mean the ones closer to the Sun? Right now I vote to add a tax of $1 a year for every 1st world nation tax payer and send the money directly to the the people of "Kathmandu, Nepal", "Karimadbad, Pakistan", "Wenzhuan, Tibet", "Himilayan foothills, Nepal" and like "La Rinconada, Peru", there that solves our problems, and the Copenhagen thing isn't required. They could really use the money since they are closer to the Sun than any of us. All I ask is that they provide some really cool exports to us.

You talk about an "equitable global governance" structure. What the heck does that mean? According to Wikipedia, Global Governance is supposed to mean world governance, or globalization. Wikipedia suggests that "global governance is not global government", but it also says "global governance would not be necessary, were there a world government". What do you mean by equitable?

If all the nations are merely getting together from time to time and telling each other whats going on, then you can all come over to my house for tea and lets talk. I mean I can certainly entertain at least 30-40 heads of state every once in a while and break out the barbecue. The secret service and translators can swim in my neighbors pool. I only speak English, but I am pretty sure most heads of state speak English anyway, and come on, we can get the point across for those really passionate subjects.

We are not your slaves, you don't own us, got it?

written by Sean Ackley

Friday, October 02, 2009

Lets use the ballot box...first

Dear Friends,

As your Contra Costa Republican Central Committee District 5 Chairman, I would like to invite you to our home on Monday, October 12 to view the video “I owe U.S.A. –the 30 minute version”, followed by social networking with a view to developing the precincts in our district and imparting passion in people for liberty under our Constitution. Harmer wants to stop the bailouts and we have the opportunity to elect him. OK, then…

We may also have a guest speaker from Oathkeepers. I encourage all of you to not only attend, but RSVP, so I can be prepared.

A quotation from Thomas Jefferson is required as the password to attend this event. Be prepared…and invite others. Its ok to bring friends.

Here is the address: 3431 Lexington Way, Antioch, CA 94509

The meeting will be at 7:00 p.m. Come early if you like.

In liberty, MOLON LABE!

John L Wadsworth

District 5 Chairman

Wednesday, August 26, 2009


1. "Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~Thomas Jefferson

2. "Those who trade liberty for security have neither." ~ John Adams

3. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms.
4. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject.

5. Only a government that is afraid of its citizens tries to control them.

6. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control.

7. You only have the rights you are willing to fight for.

8. Know guns, know peace, know safety. No guns, no peace, no safety.

9. You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.

10. Assault is a behavior, not a device.

11. 64,999,987 firearms owners killed no one yesterday.

12. The United States Constitution (c) 1791. All Rights Reserved.

13. The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others.

14. What part of 'shall not be infringed' do you NOT understand?

15. Guns have only two enemies; rust and politicians.

16. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves.
17. The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.


Saturday, August 08, 2009

h.r. 645 Nat Emerg Centers

Guess what guys? This bill was introduced the same month Obama was inaugurated – JANUARY 2009

h.r. 645 Nat Emerg Centers

At first I thought it might pertain to relocating prisoners from Guantanomo, but after reading the bill, and seeing phrases which refer to the need for housing “large amounts of people” for extended periods of time, other conclusions have to be drawn. Its also quite telling that the bill has been referred to the “Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure”. I’ve never heard of this committee, have you?


Sunday, June 28, 2009

Preparing for the July 4th TEA party events, a look back.

As we prepare for July 4th, lets remember how our country is running now and the way it should be run. The local, state and federal government has raised your taxes in the form of inflation, unfunded mandates, more fees and outright new taxes. We are coming together on July 4th to send a message that we are not going to take it any more, and we will exercise our rights for a redress of grievances and peaceable assembly. We want our republic back, we want our states to be individual and sovereign but still operate for the common good of the people.

The Federal government was created BY the states to form a Republic, NOT a democracy. A democracy is not mentioned a single time in the constitution and is the most despotic form of government because it is mob rule. A democracy is when 2 wolves and a sheep sit down and decide what is for dinner. A Republic is when that sheep has a gun.

Barack Obama in his speech to Congress during his state of the union (in talking about the TARP bailout funds) said "I have told each member of my Cabinet as well as mayors and governors across the country that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend. I have appointed a proven and aggressive Inspector General to ferret out any and all cases of waste and fraud." [end quote] Well I just wonder what form of government he exactly thinks we live under? The president is beholden to the states, and is CO-EQUAL with the legislative and Judicial of the federal. He doesn't get to send out TARP bailout money, nor question states rights.

The TARP and subsequent bailout funds are always disputed as "socialism", well people, its not socialism to distribute 12.8 Trillion dollars of tax payer money to corporations and banks, it is simply called THEFT.

The founders of this great country in 1775 took us in a totally different direction. Before, people were "ruled" by kings and queens, and by despotic power-hungry men. We then came up with the idea to "tie up the tidal forces of avarice and greed and tribal aggression of humans, put it into a republic and divide the powers against each other to create a safe zone for individual liberty to grow." [quote from our founding fathers] The individual is always oppressed by the power of government. Government is FORCE, and as such can be used to protect our liberties but unchecked it will create tyranny as it does throughout the world.

In the constitution we find instructions for how the federal government is supposed to be setup and run. The bill of rights, our first 10 amendments, discuss specifically those things which the government cannot do. It is generally thought that we are given rights in the constitution, but in reality the constitution is the chain which binds the governments actions in these matters. We must never forget this, because "when a government fears the people we have liberty, but when the people fear the government is when we have tyranny."

Just recently we were told by Senator Dick Durbin "And the banks -- hard to believe in a time when we're facing a banking crisis that many of the banks created -- are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they frankly own the place." [end quote] Do you want to be governed by how the banks want things run? Should our children be held in perpetual servitude in paying back the national debt which is created each time the Federal Reserve fires up the printing presses?

If you thought that our current bailout situation is unique or somehow a "new" idea, let me introduce you to G. Edward Griffin. "The Name of the Game is BAILLOUT" (from his book the Creature from Jekyll Island). The Federal Reserve is a private banking cartel (neither federal nor carries reserves) operated by the largest banks in the country. This cartel uses its influence and power to print money, create debt in the form of interest and manipulates exchange rates. (and he quotes) "The primary objective of this cartel is to involve the federal government as an agent for shifting the inevitable losses from the owners of the banks to the taxpayers. It is important to remember that banks do not really want to have their loans repaid. They make profit from interest ON the loan, not repayment OF the loan. One of the reasons banks prefer to lend to governments is that they do NOT expect loans ever to be repaid." [end quote] Thus you see the endless cycle caused by the Federal Reserve cartel.

In closing we must understand how this process works, and question our government. We can wave flags and shout patriotism all day, but I can "train a monkey to wave a flag, that does NOT make the monkey patriotic. I can't train the monkey to read the constitution or live the constitution." "Spectatorship is an invitation to fear. Citizenship is how we fight the politics of fear." Get engaged, talk to your neighbors, decide what you want from government and then follow-up with them, they really hate that.

Please join us for a TEA party in front of city hall on July 4th at 12noon. We have the whole park reserved, and we want everyone to come down and enjoy a couple hours with some song, speakers, and good conversation.